Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I understand your point, Time travel stories are always flawed and have always many questions left at the end. So yeah, what you say could be true.
But thinking that is like denying one ending and the reality of the choice. The story tells us that Max created the storm, and whatever flaw we may see in it, it's irrelevant to the purpose of the story and the story itsel, since it's not about time travel. I do think saving chloe set a chain of events that leads to the storm, these events being about her using her power to meddle with time to change the what happens. The symbols in the game leads us to think that saving Chloe is the butterfly effect that sets the storm in motion. So if we allow to think that saving Arcadia Bay is a murder, we can safely say that in this way to think, saving Chloe in the bathroom sets create the storm.
At the end of the day, what we think is relevant to ourself and makes us make the final choice. It's our choice our story. In my story, according to what is told, saving Chloe creates the storm so undoing it is preventing it.
If you don't think so and think that sacrificing AB is the only choice, fair enough, it's your story too ^^.
I will end my post by saying that i stand on the fact that you don't create something by reacting to it. It makes no sense.
And also a little reminder:
http://www.shacknews.com/article/92865/life-is-strange-co-director-discusses-the-games-endings-production-and-answers-chatty-questions
Oh, and i love Max, i love Chloe, i love this game.
http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/26/5/1498852557-lis-v2.jpg
Green for normal Max (powerless)
Bleu Super-Max
Than you :)
the red lines are for showing the time loop that cause AND be caused the first death of Max ^^
So true! Chloe is so kick ass!
If they wanted to give a valid reason to sacrifice chloe, they could have written it out as she also has powers. They could have made it so she has the power to control the weather and doesn't know it. Then maybe they could have delayed actually finding rachel, and when discovered Chloe loses control and the tornado happens. Then somehow max has to either stop chloe or let the town be destroyed.
Plus then maybe they can dive more into where the power comes, and personally I just think it's more interesting if there isn't only one super powered person.
Can't be a hero, I shall be a villain.
It doesn't matter how flawed may the time travel be in the game, it's just not how it is told.
And if we forget what is told, we miss the point.