Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Oh, I knew the other security gaurds exist. It's just that Ms. Grant implies that David was the only gaurd who wanted them. And if Max signs the petition and stop the cameras (to be fair... it was on the fence and the fence has to be at some cutoff, so it's plausible), the email principal Wells sends to David also implies David was the only one who wanted them (although it was never stated). I guess this accidentally teaches a real life lesson: don't take implied messages too deeply.
Since I was under the (presumably mistaken) impression David was the only one who wanted the cameras, I thought the system's only backer was discredited and the caemras would get rejected.
Since they don't get rejected if the only thing that happens is David being put on leave, I guess the cameras must have other backs like the other gaurds seen in the pool episode. I like the pool episode.