Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
This was shown to us multiple times through out the game.
Max tried to go back and make Chloe feel better about her life by saving her father from dying in that car accident because she felt that Chloe would not feel so abandoned when Max had to move away to Seattle at age 13 just after Chloe's father died in the car accident.
However what then happened was Chloe's father bought his daughter a beautiful new truck on her birthday, and that caused her to have a terrible accident where she became quadraplegic and dying of a sevre resperatory problem from that accident. If her father dies like he was supposed to that day then Chloe has a better chance to actually live a normal life and not a life bound to wheel chair because her father is not in her life and can't buy her the truck.
So I thought at the end it was time for my Max to act like an adult and instead of trying to stop the storm I had to let it do what it needed to do so that time could right itself again and vow to NEVER use the time powers again, because it is too dangerous.
I honestly felt that the game was trying to teach me that just because I can change the past it is not a good thing to do because then the future would unfold in an even worse way then what I was trying fix.
(Just to mention, when we select to kill or not to kill handicapped Chloe and if we choose to kill, we think about her feelings and the whole situation. Rationalism is welcome)
If you want to think stupid...
Saving Chloe is what we've been doing during the whole game. Why change our goal now?
If you want to think selfish...
Chloe is (If not the only) a really important person for Max's soul. She is the only one who knows everything about Max and tells Max everything about her. After all, haven't you fell in love with these two during the game? Max won't stand without Chloe.
So, as we play as Max and make decisions for her I decided to sacrifice this bay for a single best friend (Here rationalism is not welcome as you'll be a d1ck if you let your friend die even if he want to). I am a bad person and a good friend, huh?
(Thought) Why don't I have many real friends...
And yes, the whole game WILL and HAVE TO make you cry a lot. Even at good moments. Even worse at bad ones...
are you kidding me??? chloe was selfishly exploiting max and her power the whole game!
she constantly tried to put her in danger, and tried to force her sexuality upon her. she is a HORRIBLE friend.
the only time chloe did something good is when she realized arcadia bay will be desroyed if max ever used her powers and opted to sacrifice herself for the greater good.
then, and only then she finally gets her redemption.
the choice is obvious. the "save chloe" option only exists so that the player can intetionally make a bad descision or just goes "HURR DURR I WANT DA LESBIAN SEX DERP"
How does it make sense to use the powers who created the storm to sacrifice Chloe. The storm was predicted long before Chloe was sacrificed. Chloe was narcissistic. she childish wished her dad to be alive. What makes Chloe is because of what happened during her lifetime. You never managed to reach to the final episode if you never understood it was Max who used her powers to manipulate people around her. In the end you sacrificed either Bae or Bay for your own personal gain because it wasn't Max who needed the Bae or the Bay. Max Have friends in Seattle and the Bay will be rebuild. By the time we start the game the Bay is already about to turn into a ghost town. Without the consequences of our actions things never changes.
Chloe died by Mark Jefferson and David had to face his own conscience.
If we sacrifice Chloe; we eliminate time. David never redeem for his actions and it's most likely Joyce who will be ill treated by David as she never confronted David. Nathan never redeemed for killing Rachel and there won't be any evidence. If Chloe dies in the bathroom she won't be killed by Mark Jefferson and if this doesn't happen David won't redeem for hurting chloe and Nathan won't redeem for killing Rachel.
"How does it make sense to use the powers who created the storm to sacrifice Chloe"
this is indeed a plot hole, but it can be explained that you use your powers one last time, to go back to the moment when you got them, but leave reality intact.
" Bae or Bay for your own personal gain" huh? makes no sense at all. its a choice between sacrificing the lives of hundereds of people or or sacrifice one life. its a moral choicse nothing about "personal gain"
"If we sacrifice Chloe; we eliminate time" ummm NO. did you even see the canon ending?
when you sacrifice chloe, reality becomes stable again and all the anomalies are gone.
nathan is either cought by the police for shooting chloe or confesses his crimes. - which ultimatly leads the arrest of jefferson and discovering what happened to rachel.
The canon ending? We go to the diner and watch the storm pass by while destroying the Bay and Chloe died on the junkyard, is this the canon ending you're talking about because it's the last time in the game all our choices matter. We see Frank alive or dead, we see pompidou alive or dead, we persuade Joyce or didn't persuaded her to take back David. We save people along the road, all from the homeless woman to the fisherman. We kiss or don't kiss Warren. What was the point with all this if neither of these choices will matter.
In either final choice you make there's no any real bad ending. There's always a gain. If you sacrifice chloe, Max finish the education on blackwell Academy. If you sacrifice Bay, Max save Chloe. That's how there's always a reward even if one of them is better than the other.
When you sacrifice Chloe you eliminate the time who passed from point A ( the creation) to point B ( the sacrifice) or else you wouldn't been able to prevent the creation of the storm.It doesn't matter if everything did happen because in the version where Max sacrificed Chloe we never went through the journey who send us to making the final choice.
Nathan is caught in the Bay ending. He never redeem for killing Rachel. He didn't thought he deserved to be alive when he let Mark take his life. His fate is similar to Chloe. Chloe kills Frank and doesn't think she deserve a second chance.
For some the story is about a second time with your best friend. By the beginning Chloe and Max weren't good friends. it's been 3 weeks and Max never made the choice to visit.
It is not about letting Chloe die or letting the storm wash over the town and taking your chances that way. It is instead about vowing to NEVER use the time powers again because that is what caused ALL of the problems in the first place, so why should it suddenly start to work right when I go back and instead of saving Chloe in the washroom I let her die? I am still using the time powers to be able to do that so are we really positive that the storm won't still come and wreck the town anyway? It is delayed as we see in that ending because it does not come on the fateful Friday but it could still come say a week, a month, even longer later because we used the time powers to be able to let Chloe die....
I could not take that chance and I felt that the adult thing to do is to just STOP using the time powers and instead live with the consequences of the paradox storm and what it does to Arcadia Bay because I felt that the storm would still come if I used the time powers again to go back and watch my bff/lover die in the washroom.
If you choose Logic, you save the town and not use the power again.
If you choose Sentiment, you choose to save Chloe.
It is very common for any one of us to choose Logic especially not every player likes Chloe.
But think about it, if Chloe is the person you care the most. Someone you love dearly, perhaps your child or your spouse. Will you still be able to keep the Logic?
Anyway, both endings are sad as I think Max would feel guilty one way or the other.
actually, in the bay ending everyone gets redeemed.
Nathan admits he accidentally killed rachel and helps the police to catch Jefferson
David's swift arrest of both, and showing care and empathy for the late chloe redeems him and he can live togather with joyce.
even frank, who only cared about the drug money, shows up in the fueneral, obviously conteplating on the terrible things the drugs he sold did to people.
so despite the fact that "there is no canon ending" there is definetly the BETTER and WORSE endings.