Five Nights at Freddy's

Five Nights at Freddy's

Remember that scott cawthon supports donald trump
You people buying this game and other fnaf games for full price lead to the election results tonight
< >
Mostrando 136-150 de 216 comentarios
Publicado originalmente por ssuush:
idk why you get clowned so much for this take, its like ppl dont understand what "voting with your wallet" means
its a hard concept to understand for Some people
rob1998john 6 MAR a las 20:51 
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
Publicado originalmente por ssuush:
idk why you get clowned so much for this take, its like ppl dont understand what "voting with your wallet" means
its a hard concept to understand for Some people
This post you made is just flat out wanting attention and wasting everyone's time.
xyxmeden03 7 MAR a las 22:23 
Grow up scott has done alot for everyone and you probably have no purpose or did anything
CrazyZem 8 MAR a las 18:14 
Buying a 10 year old FNAF game does not influence the election even if Scott donated to Trump... how does buying a 10 year old game influence the election?

That is literally saying Markiplier supports Trump since he bought FNAF 10 years ago in what kind of world does this make sense?
Última edición por CrazyZem; 8 MAR a las 18:22
GemoNe0 9 MAR a las 1:09 
Holy based
RedHatGuy 10 MAR a las 4:12 
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
Publicado originalmente por ❄Frostboy❄:
you can stop ragebaiting, we’re out of points :3
just because a bunch of transphobes gave me jester emojis on my profile and forum posts doesn't make my opinions "ragebait"

this is ragebait. damn good ragebait, too. you deliberately posted this to get reactions out of people. whether it's your actual opinion is irrelevant.
Publicado originalmente por RedHatGuy:
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
just because a bunch of transphobes gave me jester emojis on my profile and forum posts doesn't make my opinions "ragebait"

this is ragebait. damn good ragebait, too. you deliberately posted this to get reactions out of people. whether it's your actual opinion is irrelevant.
i left a message on their profile a while back when they were questioning why a person was being rude to them in their comments section, and politely (though, rather bluntly, as i tend to speak) explained the reason. the only response provided was something about a "Phil Fish" guy and asking if i'm related, saying that "gamers forgive him and he should come back" or somethin. i've got no idea who that is but it sounds like ragebait. it was unrelated to the topic and implied (immediately before outright claiming) i was related to a person who needed to be "forgiven"

additionally, the only comments they've replied to here in a while are those that agree and express support, or comments that can easily be contested with vague statements that ultimately boil down to insults to those here/bought the game (potential ragebait), antagonistic attitude designed to provoke (more potential ragebait) or insults about scott cawthon (even more potential ragebait), and they even started this post in a place where, mostly speaking, people who already bought the game are going to see it

with all of that in mind, i am inclined to believe this is ragebait as well. their messages and comments appear to be hostile in nature, with no ounce of discussion intended. even the initial starting message (like i said on the profile of CheeseTheWasp) claimed that purchasing "Robot Bear game" will help trump get elected, then later further antagonized by claiming all those who use the clown emoji are transphobic for simply disagreeing about how an election works (as you can see here). it's also notable that they have over 200 of the Jester Award attached to their profile, which heavily implies this is something they do frequently (294 at the time of posting this), especially considering they've only earned themselves about 13 from this post.

nothing they've said is designed for productive conversation or even debate. they are too antagonistic for this to be anything else but ragebait. it's honestly not even worth looking here anymore. this troll post isn't worth my time. it's not worth your time either. this thread is unproductive and boring, i say let it rot
Última edición por nathanfish1998; 10 MAR a las 10:23
Luna ~ 11 MAR a las 2:37 
I dont care who he supports the fact he refuses to put his ♥♥♥♥ on sale for almost 10 years is why i dont buy his garbage
Publicado originalmente por Luna:
I dont care who he supports the fact he refuses to put his ♥♥♥♥ on sale for almost 10 years is why i dont buy his garbage
Scott cawthon supported donald trump for economic reasons and now there is going to be massive tarrifs on video games so expect to pay even more
Última edición por [They/Them] ChesseTheWasp; 11 MAR a las 11:17
Publicado originalmente por nathanfish1998:
Publicado originalmente por RedHatGuy:

this is ragebait. damn good ragebait, too. you deliberately posted this to get reactions out of people. whether it's your actual opinion is irrelevant.
i left a message on their profile a while back when they were questioning why a person was being rude to them in their comments section, and politely (though, rather bluntly, as i tend to speak) explained the reason. the only response provided was something about a "Phil Fish" guy and asking if i'm related, saying that "gamers forgive him and he should come back" or somethin. i've got no idea who that is but it sounds like ragebait. it was unrelated to the topic and implied (immediately before outright claiming) i was related to a person who needed to be "forgiven"
it really goes to show that you know so little about gaming politics that you don't even know who Phil Fish is. Obviously there are more reasons Donald trump won the election than Scott Cawthon but Mr Cawthon did infact fund donald trumps propaganda machine signfigantly and that shouldn't be ignored just becuase he made a game some lgbt people play.
Última edición por [They/Them] ChesseTheWasp; 11 MAR a las 14:42
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
Publicado originalmente por nathanfish1998:
i left a message on their profile a while back when they were questioning why a person was being rude to them in their comments section, and politely (though, rather bluntly, as i tend to speak) explained the reason. the only response provided was something about a "Phil Fish" guy and asking if i'm related, saying that "gamers forgive him and he should come back" or somethin. i've got no idea who that is but it sounds like ragebait. it was unrelated to the topic and implied (immediately before outright claiming) i was related to a person who needed to be "forgiven"
it really goes to show that you know so little about gaming politics that you don't even know who Phil Fish is. Obviously there are more reasons Donald trump won the election than Scott Cawthon but Mr Cawthon did infact fund donald trumps propaganda machine signfigantly and that shouldn't be ignored just becuase he made a game some lgbt people play.
lol, i forgot to unsub from the thread, but i'm kinda glad i didn't because your response is hilarious. it's actually really funny that you don't even deny that you're actively trying to ragebait this time. at least last time you tried to pin the outraged attitude on transphobes being transphobic.

hell, you even went after me on my lack of knowledge on Phil Fish (and, ironically, cut out every other part except for the part you felt you could get a leg up on me with) without denying you were ragebaiting by saying he is my "relative who made Fez", and then further trying to ragebait by claiming that me not knowing about a guy who made a game over 10 years ago means i don't even understand the overall subject of gaming politics. you didn't even consider the possibility that i didn't even have steam at the time, or that i wouldn't have had the money to upgrade from my PS2 and Wii, or even the fact that it's just a game i literally had no interest in (i don't enjoy platform games very much) and therefor never looked further into it (until right now anyway)

it really goes to show that you you're just an ordinary troll. if you truly cared, you would have simply tried convince and debate. sure, you bring your point of view in here and there, but instead of simply arguing your point, you actively insert insults and try to provoke, and you've even tried to deflect valid arguments with ad hominem attacks. hell, your 1st words to me were to compare me to a controversial figure in gaming just because my username had fish in it, not at all saying anything relating to my comment. that is pure troll behavior you know it

you've done nothing to disprove my point, and have only emphasized it by commenting the way you have. you are a liar, you are a troll, and you are not worth talking to any further than this. it's been fun though
Última edición por nathanfish1998; 11 MAR a las 22:50
Mr7Reality 12 MAR a las 21:00 
2
1
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
Publicado originalmente por nathanfish1998:
i left a message on their profile a while back when they were questioning why a person was being rude to them in their comments section, and politely (though, rather bluntly, as i tend to speak) explained the reason. the only response provided was something about a "Phil Fish" guy and asking if i'm related, saying that "gamers forgive him and he should come back" or somethin. i've got no idea who that is but it sounds like ragebait. it was unrelated to the topic and implied (immediately before outright claiming) i was related to a person who needed to be "forgiven"
it really goes to show that you know so little about gaming politics that you don't even know who Phil Fish is. Obviously there are more reasons Donald trump won the election than Scott Cawthon but Mr Cawthon did infact fund donald trumps propaganda machine signfigantly and that shouldn't be ignored just becuase he made a game some lgbt people play.
Most people don’t know who Phil Fish is because they don’t pay attention to online politics though I fail to see how this relates unless the plaintiff proves otherwise. Donating money to political campaigns and parties for the donors’ agenda is called Lobbying that’s a whole different process than just donating and nowhere near propaganda as propaganda is for the public while lobbying is for politicians to support donors’ causes. So let’s have a fun example; Help Wanted is propaganda as it’s a coverup for Fazbear Entertainment’s “bad reputation” they’ve gained from an indie game developer’s games after forcing him to make them. Lobbying would be Fazbear Entertainment funding the government to extend copyright terms and protection so they can profit more off their characters for longer than originally allowed (Hey, what is Mickey Mouse doing here?). Compared to what Trump’s campaign reached in terms of total funding $1,087,909,269, Scott donated $2,000 to his campaign so yes it was a very SIGNIFICANT drop of water in a very full tub of it and to reel out the bigger fish, he hasn’t donated to any political campaign since 2020. So can you please answer the question of how is FNAF propaganda for Donald Trump? :AoD_Ray: Scott made a fun game series, an empire out of a failure and now because of his political funding choices we must burn him and everything he’s created down to the ground and proceed to harass people who just want to lose themselves in the fun fiction. Welcome Hogwarts Legacy boycotter, it’s nice to see the grift hasn’t ended. But in all seriousness at the end of the day, be still and give up your spirit and I hope some day you may find peace.
Sources cited:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-bill/505
https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/donald-trump/candidate?id=N00023864
https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=scott+cawthon
imagine if low taper fade got a ninja
Somethin 17 MAR a las 5:15 
Stuff like this is why Scott stepped away from FNAF. Regardless of what you think it's never okay to attack people for what their opinions are. Don't get me wrong, there are good opinions and bad opinions, but this post was meant to attack. This isn't some political channel, it's FNAF, which we all love. Let's just all enjoy FNAF together instead of attacking each other for our opinions.
Publicado originalmente por They/Them ChesseTheWasp:
Publicado originalmente por nathanfish1998:
i left a message on their profile a while back when they were questioning why a person was being rude to them in their comments section, and politely (though, rather bluntly, as i tend to speak) explained the reason. the only response provided was something about a "Phil Fish" guy and asking if i'm related, saying that "gamers forgive him and he should come back" or somethin. i've got no idea who that is but it sounds like ragebait. it was unrelated to the topic and implied (immediately before outright claiming) i was related to a person who needed to be "forgiven"
it really goes to show that you know so little about gaming politics that you don't even know who Phil Fish is. Obviously there are more reasons Donald trump won the election than Scott Cawthon but Mr Cawthon did infact fund donald trumps propaganda machine signfigantly and that shouldn't be ignored just becuase he made a game some lgbt people play.
Aside from the fact that you are an expert in demagoguery, every time you complain about FNAF, someone buys a copy of it.
< >
Mostrando 136-150 de 216 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50