Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ding,ding,ding,ding. You hit the nail on the head. The mistranslated message to the board was what kindled the entire thing, but it's been the playerbase continuously fueling the fire. The only reason Movie games even made the post, is the people were on the Dev's case about it the entire time.
It also looks like they're fully on board with an open discussion with the Schedule 1 Dev to make sure everything's good.
Yeah, I'm one of the ones that said to myself that Schedule 1 was so much like DDS, because I liked DDS, and Schedule 1 was in the same vein. It's why I picked it up. they're a lot a like, but I also find the differences with them, and I like the relaxed nature of Schedule 1 and the not super complicated mixing system.
Schedule 1 looks, sounds, and plays nothing like the DDS games beyond the basic gameplay loop of make, sell drugs in an open world which a lot of games also do. The reason this is so laughable and nakedly about pushing a smaller developer is because the basic styles of the two games are so wildly different.