You know what's a difference between this game and Cyberpunk?

[Hurricane]

One was like unpolished gem, second one is a turd.
You can't polish the turd.

[Cosgar]

Come one, nobody expected Cyberpunk to turn around like it did. Don't even try to kid yourself.

[Mr_Trip]

Mythbusters proved there are multiple ways you can polish a turd.

[tallgeese]

Imagine defending Cyberpunk. Anyway, OP blocked. I'll enjoy my purchase. Get mad about it: I don't care and I won't read your replies.

[Lt.Lee Roy]

İlk olarak tallgeese tarafından gönderildi:

Imagine defending Cyberpunk. Anyway, OP blocked. I'll enjoy my purchase. Get mad about it: I don't care and I won't read your replies.

So...Your gonna block someone because he disagrees with you?
There are very reasonable arguments about why people are scared the game will be bad. I pre-ordered the deluxe edition. I really, REALLY hope it will be good. But im not delusional either. So your gonna block me because im reasonably skeptical? Edit: Cyberpunk became,literally,what Starfield should had been from the start,so yeah,easy defend.

[WhitePhantom]

Cyberpunk was rough at launch, but it at least had strong storytelling and world building. The foundation of a great game was there, it just took more time to polish it up to standard.

Plus it was a single player game, so you could forget about it and come back at any time without missing out. I personally refunded the game at launch, picked it up at half price after the 2.0 update and ended up loving every second of my 70 hour playthrough.

Try coming back to Suicide Squad after a year or two and rather than a much improved experience you're far more likely to find the game is unplayable. Live service games need to grab, and maintain an active base of players in order to justify the developers/publishers pouring more money into ongoing content and updates. There's no room for error and no second chances if the game doesn't work out at launch.

[miChi]

İlk olarak tallgeese tarafından gönderildi:

Imagine defending Cyberpunk. Anyway, OP blocked. I'll enjoy my purchase. Get mad about it: I don't care and I won't read your replies.

ooohh brother, this guys stinks!

[illage2]

İlk olarak tallgeese tarafından gönderildi:

Imagine defending Cyberpunk. Anyway, OP blocked. I'll enjoy my purchase. Get mad about it: I don't care and I won't read your replies.

So you block someone who disagrees with you, and then proceed to taunt them? You say you'll enjoy the purchase but you haven't actually purchased the game though?

[Milacetious]

The names?

[Hurricane]

İlk olarak WhitePhantom tarafından gönderildi:

Cyberpunk was rough at launch, but it at least had strong storytelling and world building. The foundation of a great game was there, it just took more time to polish it up to standard.

Plus it was a single player game, so you could forget about it and come back at any time without missing out. I personally refunded the game at launch, picked it up at half price after the 2.0 update and ended up loving every second of my 70 hour playthrough.

Try coming back to Suicide Squad after a year or two and rather than a much improved experience you're far more likely to find the game is unplayable. Live service games need to grab, and maintain an active base of players in order to justify the developers/publishers pouring more money into ongoing content and updates. There's no room for error and no second chances if the game doesn't work out at launch.

That's exactly what I'm thinking, glad somebody understands

[VastGirth]

Cyberpunk was rubbish at launch because it was buggy and unfinished. This has since been fixed, albeit after a long time.

SS will be rubbish at launch because it at its core it is a bad game: a cash grabbing Live Service. This cannot be fixed without fundamentally remaking the entire game.

[Hurricane]

İlk olarak VastGirth tarafından gönderildi:

Cyberpunk was rubbish at launch because it was buggy and unfinished. This has since been fixed, albeit after a long time.

SS will be rubbish at launch because it at its core it is a bad game: a cash grabbing Live Service. This cannot be fixed without fundamentally remaking the entire game.

Exaclty, although I would he happy if Rocksteady surprised me

[ShitsWhenGiggles]

Cyberpunk was released in a poor state and massively underdelivered what was promised.

It received bugg fixes and patches and 1 out of 3 promised DLC and no NG+ because to hard.

And this is just garbage.

to me both studios are crap XD

Edit : Work was postponed because they suddenly decided to have keanu reeves in it, and NG+ wich was pushed back and back and eventually promised to be part of the first DLC was suddenly not going to happen anymore followed by Idres Alba being announced for the DLC.
CDPR screwing over customers to meet actors.

[Dork_Stalker_310]

İlk olarak Cosgar tarafından gönderildi:

Come one, nobody expected Cyberpunk to turn around like it did. Don't even try to kid yourself.

Nope, it was expected to anyone familiar with studio's previos titles.
CDPR almost always release games with a great foundation in a... let's say, less than desirable state and then fix them with Definitive Editions.

[KnowledgeCoffee]

I honestly will probably get more hours and enjoyment from this than I did from cyberpunk and I loved cyberpunk

[REhorror]

I feel Cyberpunk is a good game, play it on GOG on launch, never play 2.0 though.
It's just kind of a stepdown compared to the previous Witcher games, and I actually don't enjoy the setting too much.