Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I (no offense) didn't buy 2 AMD295-X2 cards for 30FPS. (I got them for Star Citizen) :)
Yup - the devs will port this on Xbox as they said.
it's not the devs fault you thrown your money out of the window.
30FPS is all thats needed to run this game smoothly.....my game runs smooth on 30FPS with no hic ups or stuttering.....
and this is unreal engine 4 they wanna use for the next gen train simulator
i would say turn the fps up to at least 60 fps cap
They prob would, but its still alpha...when the game goes beta, then the devs focus on engine problems
this game already is very nice off course
i know it is early access
It would surprise me if the animations and/or physics are somehow tied to the FPS.
If this is the case, I would ask very kindly that the devs rectify this so we can all brag about how disgustingly high our FPS can be on our ridiculously beastly PC rigs.