FPS

[Pr17ch]

Why is the game capped at 30 fps , its bloody anoying also please fix the flikering trees.......

[EnFo]

Because... Consoles?

I don't know if that's the reason but with this getting a console release it's just a guess.

To be honest the graphics options for this game are quite pathetic they really need to open that settings menu up.

[[ Col ] Chamberlain]

What is the Problem with constant 30 FPS? Game running fine, no lagg nothing. I dont understand why allways so many People need 60 or more FPS. You knowing that the Human Eye dont can see more than 30 FPS ??
Right in an Action Game like COD or something else , is more FPS better, but in an SImu you dont need more.

[EnFo]

Walking around the lake I can really tell it's running at 30 fps as it does not look smooth to me.
Before you say it's my PC trust me its not I am so used to running all the latest game at 60+ playing a game at 30 really shows.

[t E d d y]

30 fps is good but it destroys the very nice created game with his beautiful nature, 60 would be a lot better to look at it and to walk in it :)

[beerland]

Originally posted by Col Chamberlain:

You knowing that the Human Eye dont can see more than 30 FPS ??

If you arent trolling... rofl

Even the difference between 144hz & 60hz is very noticable. 30 fps is a slideshow if you are used to better. :p

[Pamyu]

To be clear here, human eyes cannot make difference over 24-25 frames per second. 24 FPS was cinematographic base framerate for fluid movement and be able to add the music on parallel.

It was prove that this amount can be modify according to each person's reactivity (1-2 frames max).

30 FPS was the base of Vertical Synchronisation (Vsync) and any upper FPS (60-100) are only use for screens to avoid visual artifacts.

Base on all those facts, this thread has no reason to exist.

[apx]

Originally posted by Col Chamberlain:

You knowing that the Human Eye dont can see more than 30 FPS ??

the human eye realize a clean movement at ~24 fps. but in games/films, where you have additional movement cause of the real or imaginated camera, the position of objects will move at the edges and sides faster trough the picture as in the middle, cause you have perspective.

that is why you shouldn't have heavy and fast camera-movement in films, cause it produces stuttering at the edges and doesn't look fine.

and there a higher framerate kicks in. cause you have more pictures while the movement, more pictures will be shot at the same time. and this will result in an much smoother look.

you can see this if you look at two scenes, one with heavy movement and one who is still - one with 30fps recorded and one with 60fps.
at the still scene you won't see any difference, but if some movement appears you can identify the scene, recorded with a higher framerate immediate.

tl;dr
more frames = more information can be shown at the same time = smoother look

[sendblink23]

Originally posted by Aruvyel:

To be clear here, human eyes cannot make difference over 24-25 frames per second. 24 FPS was cinematographic base framerate for fluid movement and be able to add the music on parallel.

It was prove that this amount can be modify according to each person's reactivity (1-2 frames max).

30 FPS was the base of Vertical Synchronisation (Vsync) and any upper FPS (60-100) are only use for screens to avoid visual artifacts.

Base on all those facts, this thread has no reason to exist.

lol obvious troll is obvious, you have 90+ hours in csgo - doubt you would ever play that on 23.976 or 30fps cinematic experience :P

Anyways seeing this thread mention its locked to 30fps, its just sad for PC Gaming

[Sistermatic™]

Originally posted by sendblink23:

...you have 90+ hours in csgo - doubt you would ever play that on 23.976 or 30fps cinematic experience :P

If I was shooting fish I'd care.

[Pamyu]

Originally posted by Sistermatic (♥♥♥♥ u all):

Originally posted by sendblink23:

...you have 90+ hours in csgo - doubt you would ever play that on 23.976 or 30fps cinematic experience :P

If I was shooting fish I'd care.

<3

[76561198161018595]

Originally posted by Sistermatic (♥♥♥♥ u all):

If I was shooting fish I'd care.

That would make proper fish care a lot harder though.

Kevin

[MassivePsychosis]

Originally posted by Col Chamberlain:

What is the Problem with constant 30 FPS? Game running fine, no lagg nothing. I dont understand why allways so many People need 60 or more FPS. You knowing that the Human Eye dont can see more than 30 FPS ??
Right in an Action Game like COD or something else , is more FPS better, but in an SImu you dont need more.

You must be joking right? I have just upgraded my monitor to a G7 Samsung with 240HZ refresh and now I can get games running at up to 200 fps with no tearing or stuttering and its like a whole new ball game. My eyes can see a huge difference between 100 to 200 fps. To say the human eye can't detect above 30 fps is the most absurd thing I have ever heard. Also Dovetails newer game Catch Coarse and Carp is now running at 60fps and its a very noticeable improvement. Its actually very off putting playing this at 30 fps, cause every movement is so jittery and there's also severe flickering for my eye.

[MassivePsychosis]

Originally posted by Pamyu:

To be clear here, human eyes cannot make difference over 24-25 frames per second. 24 FPS was cinematographic base framerate for fluid movement and be able to add the music on parallel.

It was prove that this amount can be modify according to each person's reactivity (1-2 frames max).

30 FPS was the base of Vertical Synchronisation (Vsync) and any upper FPS (60-100) are only use for screens to avoid visual artifacts.

Base on all those facts, this thread has no reason to exist.

To compare gaming to films is not very wise, because after all games are supposed to be a surreal experience, smooth,fluid and responsive. Pre 2012'ish movies were and some still are generally shot @ 24fps. The reason why was down to one thing budget. Films stocks were not cheap, so 24fps was a good compromise. Nowadays you will find that a movies are still shot on film because the film maker believes it is better, "Digital camera sensors, are made up of millions of tiny squares that give us an image. Film isn't split up in such a linear way, and because of that, it naturally blends light and colours better.
You will find that experts may say the eye can detect between 30 - 60 fps, but they cannot confirm or prove anything(not everything you read online is genuine). Anyway, how the heck can we measure what the human eye detects in this sense? As a gamer from experience, 30 - 60 fps is very low nowadays and we would not settle for this range, no matter what genre, whether it be racing, fishing or FPS.

Another piece of info that experts say ;
"Because the cameras were hand cranked, the rate of each frame could vary from 14 to 26fps, yet were projected at 24fps no matter what. ... Film stock wasn't cheap and it was decided that a rate of 24 was the best compromise between how much stock would be needed and creating a satisfactory level of realistic motion."

So in summary films were shot @ 24fps because it was a question of coming to a compromise between budget and results. Not because the human eye can only detect up to 30 or 60 fps. Nowadays films are mostly shot with digital cameras so that changes everything. When the motion flow is too smooth, it reveals flaws in acting and everything loses its appeal. That's why the majority of movies these days look cheap and actors even like once upon a time, AAA star Bruce Willis looks awful screen. Low budget movies are spewing out of the cracks at the moment. I personally still prefer movies shot on film.

You must be a troll, because your arguments contradict themselves!!!