Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There's new regions, new creatures, challanges, actual campaigns with the different slugcats, more lore/collectibles and the stuff you already mentioned
Co-op was previously available, yes.
A lot of the QOL features were previously available, yes (raindeer fix, making the game easier, etc.)
All the mods should still work so long as you've set your RW version to 1.5 or earlier using the Steam beta/branch feature.
Jolly Co-op's author stated himself that this was the case for his mod, and it stands to reason it should hold true for everything else.
Yeah but you're using an outdated version that doesn't have many of downpour's features
MSC 1.5 was going to add the new rooms, endings, slugcats, enemies, Safari Mode, and music. Everything else in this update is either from another mod, or new.
Modders have always been able to get compensated through free-as-in-beer methods. Donations, patreon or similar services, etc.
Your post is a weird way of saying Bethesda was right when they tried to add paid mods. But everyone (rightfully) hated it when they tried, which goes to show how popular your opinion is in the world at large.
Maybe, maybe not. It depends on what features the user cares about. Whether someone should or shouldn't purchase Downpour was not the point of my post, it was to highlight that if one wishes to use the RainDB / BlepIO mods of 1.1 or 1.5, they are still free to do so, and these versions + mods are not being "blocked" by Downpour.
Some are under the impression that the update to 1.9 forces users to wait for the mods they had to also be updated by their authors into Workshop form, and I'm hoping to help some people avoid the confusion.
Lmao go to the discord and go mention the things you're saying here, you'll be laughed out, you're deluded if you think most people think this is the same thing as paid mods and that Downpour being made official is bad.
Also no this is completely different to paid mods and yes i don't care about paid mods nor do i see why people threw such a tantrum about it.
Let's be real here you're just salty you have to pay for Downpour cuz you're entitled
Remix + quality of life + bug fixes makes makes 1.9 the superior version for 99% of people.
ok? neither was it the point of mine?
No one was arguing that you couldn't do that anymore in this thread.
That may be true, but the DLC costs money. A user may not see the value gained in this "superior version" as worth the price, and if they wish to avoid purchasing it, may wonder whether their mods will still work. I'm fleshing out the information in regards to the versioning.
Perhaps not, but someone might interpret it that way. I mentioned that you could play the non-workshop mods on older versions of RW, and you responded "but you're using an outdated version without better features." The implication being "you're missing out without Downpour and you should get Downpour."
I wasn't saying anyone was making the argument, I was simply laying out information to help people avoid arriving at a misconception I myself had. More information is better for the consumer.
As an off-topic aside, I might be misinterpreting things but while there's nothing outright offensive or anything in your responses, there seems to be this undercurrent of defensiveness and antagonism.
One, the discord is not representative of gamers as a whole (which the devs are marketing towards). Everyone on the discord would've bought Downpour even if the devs livestreamed themselves ritualistically sacrificing a toddler.
Two, no it is in no way different, in some ways worse since Bethesda actually did revenue share even if it was ♥♥♥♥, instead of a lump payment. Your opinion on it is also irrelevant, since almost everyone besides you hates it.
Three, unrelated to the topic at hand, Discord is thrash in general.
Nothing I have said is anything but an objective truth (except my opinion on Discord. And the ritualistic sacrifice thing just now, that's called hyperbole). You might also want to pull out the ol' Merriam Webster and look up the definition of paid off (note to make it easier for you, it's a conjugation of "pay off").
New user experience is that this is good. Ethically questionable? Shrewd business certainly. But, at least someone got paid for their work, and it was adapted for a much greater audience of players like me who would have been done with the game after 30 hours finishing the Hunter's campaign.
Hope you find the necro hilarious