Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
To be fair, The Guild games do try to be somewhat historically accurate.
I touched on this before, but I think I'll take some time to elaborate. Yes and no. It is first and foremost an economic simulation game with a medieval theme. There are many, many places where gameplay trumps history. Gender has never been historically accurately represented, and I don't think it's due to gameplay concerns (it would have been trivial to simply limit the player to a male character). Instead, the developers consciously chose to allow players to play as a woman, and even to force them to play as a woman if that was the gender of your firstborn heir.
1) Because the game would kind of suck if your inheritance got split up upon your character dying, the games enforce Absolute Primogeniture succession, giving all your stuff to your firstborn regardless of gender. In most societies, unless you were a king (and even then very, very few cultures allowed women to inherit the title), all of your stuff would get split up, and in some cases the male heirs would get a double share over female heirs.
2) Women were certainly not allowed to hold political office.
3) Some societies did not value a woman's word in court! Imagine a game of The Guild where you can't press charges against the idiots who keep firebombing your business!
4) Women would not be guards and would not participate in combat.
5) Women could not enjoy the full benefit of guilds.
6) Female clergy? Clergy being able to marry? You would be unable to continue your dynasty by choosing this profession. I understand that The Guild 3 will not allow the clergy profession, so I'm curious if this was the reasoning.
And so on...
So, unless The Guild 3 is going in a more historically accurate direction, I really don't think that the medieval theme is a legitimate argument against same sex relationships. Besides, I doubt that you'd even notice if this were in the game, I bet the AI would be set to not do it, or rarely do it, and you could probably modify the value.
If you only want it to be moddable then that's quite reasonable. We all would like moddability.
Ted Cruz supporters?
You realize Golem Labs is in Quebec, Canada, right? (Source: http://www.golemlabs.com/?about) Their political riding has elected NDP MPs since 2011 and hasn't seen a Conservative candidate elected since 1997
Seriously where are you getting your information from
Can't you take a break for the fanatic politics thingie?
Also, i find it extremely rude that you come here and flat out say that you did not buy the previous game because of the one very small aspect.
Look elsewhere, preferably away from here.
Having that possibility, at least with a mod, could have tipped the balance in the other way. Possibly.
And I don't think that I was rude. My apologies if someone has felt offended, but I think that you're overreacting a bit here. And being a bit rude too. Which is quite ironic, truth to be told.