Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The game is missing a lot of things that old COD's had to counter such things.
Best counter to the haymaker though is to stand about 20-30ft away, they can't touch you. so when you see them, don't go charging in....realize that they can't touch you from a distance and use that knowledge to calmly take them down.
Problem is, the maps all are basically coordoor shooters, which means you're not going to find too much open space with distance. kind of a joke to even have sniper guns since there isn't even really a distance in any map to justify them, they basically have zero advantage anywhere.
What they need to do is give the haymaker more bullet spread and a slightly slower fire rate with a slightly smaller clip, and halve the total spawning ammo.
they kind of catered to noobs and spammers on BO3 design decisions. They made it so you don't need skill, so that you can't survive long even if you do have skill unless you camp hard, and so that people can spam the heck out of SMG/nades everywhere.
Well all that stuff you said would make sense if the gun was actually the best close quarters gun.. but as it stands the haymakers dps is lower then that of any other gun apart from some of the other shotguns and snipers.. (they make up for this by having single shot kill capability).
so I mean you sound like a pretty intelligent guy. if you could explain to me why the gun needs a nerf when the machine pistol as secondary weapon actually outdamages it from all ranges. It kills with the exact same amount of bullets at close range (which is 3) but the rate of fire is obviously way way higher. The haymaker has pretty low rate of fire for an automatic weapon ..it just makes me think.. have YOU even used this gun yet? and if not why are you calling for a nerf? I mean it takes like 6-7 bullets at medium range already.. where as the machine pistol takes 4-5.
I just used the machine pistol as an example because i have a bit of experience with it but tbh you could have chosen nearly any gun (the kn44, the VMP, the vesper, the gorgon) all have greater damage at all ranges.
The greatest advantage of the haymaker is the spread but you still really need to center the shot correctly or you will miss all but 2 or so pellets which do laughable damage.
Just to be clear.. im not attacking you at all, I just want to get a grasp on why some people want this gun nerfed as it already has some of the lowest dps.
Well let's approach it from the perspective that the haymaker is almost exclusively hipfire, there isn't toughness in the game. No toughness means that hipfire got a whole ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ better than it was in previous games.
Haymaker has a 3 shot kill 16 shot clip, 5 kills in one clip if you're conservative.... Now try doing that with any other gun in the game that is automatic.
Hi,
Treyarch doesn't read steam forums, stupid.
But seriously I havn't had any issue with Dealing against Haymakers, I've seen a few And yes the fire rate is Fast, But that ♥♥♥♥ takes 8 Shots ot kill past like 7 meters xD The only reason its "OP" is becasue You're either within 5 meters and The enemy got shots off before you, Or You're just Not hittinng your own shots.
It really doesnt need a nerf, and I've never even used the thing.
This is why we need dedicated servers that we can run ourselves. If a gun or item is unbalanced, we simply put it in the ban list so you can't use it.