Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
so yeah no point in lowering it unless the pc cant handle it.
well some might go over 200%, i cant however since my gpu wont allow it unless i change it in "config.ini", anyway, u can still use 200% if u want without lowering the resolution, but i doubt anything over 100% will affect the look on graphics anyway, i think all it will do is to lower the fps instead..
but you are right the resolution from textures will not get better but (hard to explain with my bad english) your game will have more pixels and something like corners from buildings will be straight lines. same affect with aa but cost you a lot of fps too
Youtube works too.
Sometimes, if framerate is important it's better(looks wise) to use a lower render resoultion with some AA which is it's main use (consoles use this trick allllllllllllll the time).
Over 100%, it will do a simular job to what AA does. Imo, using better AA technics at native is better most of the time but I know some people like running games 2-3X Native Render Resoultion with no AA so it's probably a prefence thing.
Also, petty sure Nvidia DSR mode does a better job than using ingame render resoultion when ya going over 100% anyway.