Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Was just doing my research on the game as i am old it looks appealing, i came to the decision not to buy it, different reasoning though... however the drama here about the devs making money in a sub model xD its just amazing especially as you guys all play a game now after 37 buck purchase for free that will get wiped when its launched xD.
When MMOs started there were subs and that was the only way, it was the glory days, for 12.99 everyone was equal and all items you had, you got them by doing the grind (or paying someone to do it, or botting yourself.. see life was never fair)...
In short i think its a joke that you guys moan about them wanting to make money or at least reduce the cost of stuff till they can go live, i personally do not think the game will be a commercial success its to nieche for it, so the subs are likely not the only way the game will need to make money.
Anyhow that`s it for me for today going to play some good old star wars galaxies later for free, where i drop like 10-20 bucks a month for the servers to run cause the freeloaders wont do it.
Don't get wrong I'd legit never pay for this, not after the kickstarter stuff. But I've watched this thing in dev hell longer than star citizen and unlike star citizen these dudes haven't tried to scam out stuff beyond a few cringefest packages.
It's clearly going to be sub model it's mmo.
Whether it's successful who knows.
TLDR: I legit do not like the company here. At all. I still see value in a sub but then again I wouldn't pay it because this game is gonna get released when I'm actual corpse.
However devs do deserve their own because at least they aren't totally scamming kick starter campaigns. Whining about subs in 2025 after 28 years of this model...is wild.
Okay so I've written and been around many a mmosites in my years. Many.
From stratics to mmosite actually.
12.95 back in the day was worth about 18 bucks give or take. UO was 9.99 +1.72 .
EQ was about 12 for awhile but it went and down and up with SOE.
So.... Yeah a 15 dollar sub in 2025 is about 9 bucks. Give or take. In value.
We pay less for mmos now. Than we did then. I still have a billing statement from meridian for 43 dollars. 43 dollars to play meridian in 1996.
Edit: Oh wow they are still doing that whole build one guild up thing according to people I reached out to who have purchased it. Like man...you guy still using 2 gms's 1 guild favoritism on EA...ooof. Yeah this game is run like a private server for a mmo.
It's wild they allow 2 gm's to ban people over a guild just ruling the ♥♥♥♥ out of them.
I'll take my forum ban now.
Sub keeps the free players out too.... a portion of that audience is very toxic
Subs actually make people MORE toxic. As they are more “protected” than they would in free games. In other words, mods are much less likely to perma ban accounts if there is a sub. Look at WoW. You have to be the biggest, racist PoS you could possibly be, and even then you’ll probably just get a month ban.
Free games just have casual trolling as they have to walk on eggshells at all times or risk their account being terminated.
I've been following the game forever, I expected a sub, I just want it to be outlined because the main video on steam right now says, quote "Single Purchase, No Pay To Win, Only $39.99", and if that 'Single Purchase' changes and blindsides people who aren't watching for definitive responses on forums (or are even aware it's on the table), then it's going to cause an uproar. I've seen games die for less lmao
If I had to weigh in, my favorite model has been DDOs (although DDO is a much more extreme and p2w case). If you sub, you get all the content, but you can also pay for modules that give you access to the content forever without a subscription. Sub also comes with benefits you can't get through modules, like a tiny (5%) exp boost, but that'd need to be adapted to this game because that's technically p2w.
I'd take an in game purchase to fund a server move or a character rename but thats about it for me. In game monetisation has killed EQ2.
Very dishonest answer.
There's a specified space on the store page for games with subscriptions.
Most people don't expand that box to read devs responses to the EA questionnaire. And besides, 99.9% of devs answer to that question is if the game will stay the same price or go up after it comes out of EA. I know you're here to defend this game endlessly, but this isn't the hill you want to die on lol.
It's not a dishonest answer. It's in the same place on every EA game. If you don't read it that's 100% on you.
In the future, just read the pricing change question on every EA game you buy. Easy.
The blue box is huge and at the top of page. You literally have to scroll past it to read the "About the Game" and the features section.
And this is a design by Steam. You guys talking like the developers designs the store pages. Steam does that and they put everything in the same place so readers know where look.
You keep trying to paint this like they're doing their best to hide information from you. It's not their fault you're too lazy to read what they write.