Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
At first I didn't like Death's voice. I would have expected him to be a cold and indifferent narrator about what's going on, speaking from a neutral point of view. Yet Death's voice shows empathy to Warren which doesn't fit that role at all.
Now I'm thinking that's intended. Death isn't indifferent, he's got his own agenda. He kind of guides Warren along culminating in how he literally advices him to act in Death's own interest in the end. "Unveiling" the Devil's manipulation in order to manipulate Warren towards his own goal. Where does a world where noone dies anymore leave Death after all?
Intended or not, I very much like that concept.
That's a fine thought, I did not even think about it when I finished the game an hour earlier.
Anyhow though, I think game like Hard West has exactly the ending it should have. If there was a happy ending, I'd still go for bad one. It's like to say noir movies should have happy ending.
The only thing I'm kinda unhappy about is that the Undertaker's fate after the final showdown is not explained even a little bit in the end, even if you play as him.