Review bombing

[oChalko]

Why do people do this? I understand if the game crashes you might be mad but if its related to DLSS just turn it off.

You honestly dont even need it lets be for real

[MancSoulja]

If I bought a game that professed to use a unique feature of my GPU and it didn't work, i'd leave a bad review too.

Do you know what's even easier than turning DLSS off? Making a game that works the way you said it would when you asked people for their money.

[Zoopy]

Let people leave whatever reviews they want. Reviews that are directly about the content and features of the game, including broken graphics settings, are not review bombing. It's just people reviewing the game.

Review bombing is organised. This is not.

[At@At]

Originally posted by Zoopy:

Let people leave whatever reviews they want. Reviews that are directly about the content and features of the game, including broken graphics settings, are not review bombing. It's just people reviewing the game.

Review bombing is organised. This is not.

Review bombing is any review with the intent to effect the review score rather than how you feel about a game. At least that's my definition. Most ppl just call any "large" (large can be relative) wave of negative reviews coming in at around the same time to be review bombing.

Either way, It doesn't need to be organised.

[At@At]

Originally posted by MancSoulja:

If I bought a game that professed to use a unique feature of my GPU and it didn't work, i'd leave a bad review too.

Do you know what's even easier than turning DLSS off? Making a game that works the way you said it would when you asked people for their money.

I get your point but it's a unique feature of the GPU. Review the GPU lol.

[Ludicrits]

Originally posted by At@At:

Originally posted by MancSoulja:

If I bought a game that professed to use a unique feature of my GPU and it didn't work, i'd leave a bad review too.

Do you know what's even easier than turning DLSS off? Making a game that works the way you said it would when you asked people for their money.

I get your point but it's a unique feature of the GPU. Review the GPU lol.

Not how it works. Its up to the devs to make sure the features they promote actually worm. Crazy the reach you're trying for here lmao

When a game has issues that should of been easily caught during testing, there's a valid reason for criticism. Especially when these issues have persisted since their last release. This is not review bombing. This is just reviewing. Your definition is not the correct and factual definition of review bombing.

[At@At]

Originally posted by Ludicrits:

Originally posted by At@At:

I get your point but it's a unique feature of the GPU. Review the GPU lol.

Not how it works. Its up to the devs to make sure the features they promote actually worm. Crazy the reach you're trying for here lmao

When a game has issues that should of been easily caught during testing, there's a valid reason for criticism. Especially when these issues have persisted since their last release.

When did they promote DLSS as their feature that works? Nobody reviewed games negatively when DLSS, ray tracing and Nvidia hair works didn't work well in past games. You'd expect Witcher 3, a game that actually did promote that Nvidia hair feature to be reviewed as trash because even today it doesn't work. They reviewed the feature itself as crappy.

[Ludicrits]

Originally posted by At@At:

Originally posted by Ludicrits:

Not how it works. Its up to the devs to make sure the features they promote actually worm. Crazy the reach you're trying for here lmao

When a game has issues that should of been easily caught during testing, there's a valid reason for criticism. Especially when these issues have persisted since their last release.

When did they promote DLSS as their feature that works? Nobody reviewed games negatively when DLSS, ray tracing and Nvidia hair works didn't work well in past games. You'd expect Witcher 3, a game that actually did promote that Nvidia hair feature to be reviewed as trash because even today it doesn't work. They reviewed the feature itself as crappy.

Did you even play witcher 3 when it originally launched on pc? It was a mess at the time in comparison to console in terms of stability.

Nvidia hairworks works fine. It's just demanding af. Thus why no one uses it. No real gain for performance hit unless you need to see your hair realistically blowing.

Tell me you don't know next time. Dlss isn't even causing the crashing.


Oh....private account...makes sense now.

[mjc0961]

It's not related to DLSS, I've never had it on and the game is still crashing

[Hawkins]

While i didnt leave a review yet i am crashing with dlss disabled. also tried limiting fps which didnt help either.

[oChalko]

Originally posted by At@At:

Originally posted by Ludicrits:

Not how it works. Its up to the devs to make sure the features they promote actually worm. Crazy the reach you're trying for here lmao

When a game has issues that should of been easily caught during testing, there's a valid reason for criticism. Especially when these issues have persisted since their last release.

When did they promote DLSS as their feature that works? Nobody reviewed games negatively when DLSS, ray tracing and Nvidia hair works didn't work well in past games. You'd expect Witcher 3, a game that actually did promote that Nvidia hair feature to be reviewed as trash because even today it doesn't work. They reviewed the feature itself as crappy.

upgrade your potato

witcher 3 works fine and you dont need DLSS or frame generation

[magicpea77]

Originally posted by oChalko:

Originally posted by At@At:

When did they promote DLSS as their feature that works? Nobody reviewed games negatively when DLSS, ray tracing and Nvidia hair works didn't work well in past games. You'd expect Witcher 3, a game that actually did promote that Nvidia hair feature to be reviewed as trash because even today it doesn't work. They reviewed the feature itself as crappy.

upgrade your potato

witcher 3 works fine and you dont need DLSS or frame generation

Are you retaard? So people complain about crash = review bomb?
Are you 12 yo fanboi?
Game was so good but it still crash "a lot" and need to be fix.
What it worst is this kind of fanboism,

[oChalko]

Originally posted by magicpea77:

Originally posted by oChalko:

upgrade your potato

witcher 3 works fine and you dont need DLSS or frame generation

Are you retaard? So people complain about crash = review bomb?
Are you 12 yo fanboi?
Game was so good but it still crash "a lot" and need to be fix.
What it worst is this kind of fanboism,

can you form a sentence without trashing someone? lol

your account is private so no wonder you think youve got big balls

♥♥♥♥♥ kid

[Zoopy]

Originally posted by At@At:

Review bombing is any review with the intent to effect the review score rather than how you feel about a game.

The two are intrinsically linked. You do not leave a review if you do not feel a certain way about the game. The only reason anyone ever leaves a review is because they feel a certain way about the game.

Giving a game a negative review because DLSS is broken is reviewing the game. It is perfectly valid.

Originally posted by At@At:

I get your point but it's a unique feature of the GPU. Review the GPU lol.

I don't think you understand how this works. DLSS is a software feature that requires an Nvidia GPU to run, But it still requires developers to properly implement DLSS in their own games.

So why on earth would you review the GPU if DLSS in this game causes issues? The issue isn't with the GPU. The GPU is perfectly capable of using DLSS. The way the devs implemented DLSS in their game is the problem.

[ComingDragon]

"Leave the multi billion yen company alone"

[Zoopy]

Originally posted by oChalko:

upgrade your potato

witcher 3 works fine and you dont need DLSS or frame generation

Just like you have the right to not care about DLSS, other people have the right to care that it isn't working properly in this game.

Let people have their opinions.