Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A while ago I watched a video about mechanics of board games by Totalbiscuit that I think can help with this conversation, here it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFVly3iZYaQ
Don't think I follow - at least in terms of it being based on Sunless Sea. Notice how Go has zero theme and Chess has a meaningless enough theme that having a Simpsons chess set makes no difference to the game. Once you simplify it so much that Fallen London/Sunless Sea is just a skin you're putting on it, I lose all interest.
Perhaps you thought I was replying to the person who suggested Betrayal at the House on the Hill (a rules-heavy game), rather than your original post?