For Honor vs. Mordhau

[Biggus Dickus]

Which one is better, and why?

[Kujaku of the Four Celestials]

You can't compare those two games because the mechanics of these games are totally different.

[Shard of Manus]

Mordhau. Lutes.

[Aleupo]

Mordhau, the games are not similar but when you look for a mediaval melee game both can be considered and Mordhau is conceptionnally way more fun imo, 1st person bloodfest with 64 players vs. 3rd person, 8 players plus very stupid and annoying npcs, no competition, i'd prefer Mordhau any time, i think even a lot of For Honor players were into Chivalry back then and that's what made them interested in FH, now they got what they really want. There are reasons FH sits at 50% positive reviews (= trash).

[gogame]

Originally posted by Alex Lupo:

Mordhau, the games are not similar but when you look for a mediaval melee game both can be considered and Mordhau is conceptionnally way more fun imo, 1st person bloodfest with 64 players vs. 3rd person, 8 players plus very stupid and annoying npcs, no competition, i'd prefer Mordhau any time, i think even a lot of For Honor players were into Chivalry back then and that's what made them interested in FH, now they got what they really want.

dude stop making mordhau like its 1person u can play it both. 3rd 1st

[76561198048978863]

Mordhau is "spin to win"

[Skearn]

Originally posted by OscarTheGrouch:

Which one is better, and why?

personally mordhau but only because of the degree of customization.

the thing is; i love to be able to make my character from scratch, make it work somehow in some weird way, and see myself rise through my efforts with my own idea's.

for honor doesnt do that, yes you can make weird builds with perks but its all just so very limited and in some regards mordhau isnt different in that you need to feint and stuff to make anything work, but still, its a bigger playground on just that.

MECHANICALLY speaking for honor is better.
having throws, bash's, command grabs, guardbreaks and hyper armour (yes mordhau has armour but its more like "how thick do i want my paper mache today hmmmmm") is good, i only feel that the chambering in mordhau would act be a nice addition to for honor in some way....also i once had the idea of making all blocks reflex (like in mordau) but i digress on that.


if for honor had a hero that you could customise at the expense of in-depth specialization (like goki being a trader) than i would drop every other game in a heartbeat.

[NeuroticSlav]

Completely different games. But fun factor right now is better in FH for me. Mordhau team modes are terrible because of small map pool and maps that we get there are terribly designed.
Duels are fun but they need maps specifialy designed for them .

[76561198836878514]

for honor is better but still u can not compare these 2 games

[Fifty Shades of Hacks]

Mordhau is better. It needs skill to git gud
and not spamming to win like in For Honor

[Gaser]

Originally posted by Fifty Shades of Hacks:

Mordhau is better. It needs skill to git gud
and not spamming to win like in For Honor

Spam wont get you anywhere here too.

[Spooky7.62]

Originally posted by OscarTheGrouch:

Which one is better, and why?

Truly their two different games

[Gaser]

Originally posted by Hitsuran:

Completely different games. But fun factor right now is better in FH for me. Mordhau team modes are terrible because of small map pool and maps that we get there are terribly designed.
Duels are fun but they need maps specifialy designed for them .

Got to agree with you,

[Salamarder]

Originally posted by Gaser:

Originally posted by Hitsuran:

Completely different games. But fun factor right now is better in FH for me. Mordhau team modes are terrible because of small map pool and maps that we get there are terribly designed.
Duels are fun but they need maps specifialy designed for them .

Got to agree with you,

With respect.
I don't get it why does it matter if they are "different." You can compare For Honor with a fps game too, or I can compare SC2 with CS:GO. Obviously these two examples are extreme, and you can only compare very basic things such as like playerbase, graphics, community, learning curve, how game mechanincs and different playstyles affecting your gameplay (for example you can have a defensive playstyle in any of these games).

Regarding Mordhau and For Honor, they are completely different? Both are medieval games with CQC mechanics and such. Yes you can't compare then in depth because they are indeed completely different.
OP asked which is better, not which has better high lvl 1v1 potential.

[Simple Kind of Man]

Originally posted by Salamarder:

Originally posted by Gaser:

Got to agree with you,

With respect.
I don't get it why does it matter if they are "different." You can compare For Honor with a fps game too, or I can compare SC2 with CS:GO. Obviously these two examples are extreme, and you can only compare very basic things such as like playerbase, graphics, community, learning curve, how game mechanincs and different playstyles affecting your gameplay (for example you can have a defensive playstyle in any of these games).

Regarding Mordhau and For Honor, they are completely different? Both are medieval games with CQC mechanics and such. Yes you can't compare then in depth because they are indeed completely different.
OP asked which is better, not which has better high lvl 1v1 potential.

no no you cant thats like saying witcher is better then dark souls.....they are not even on the same lvl....

[Salamarder]

Originally posted by LK| Lord_of_Death:

Originally posted by Salamarder:

With respect.
I don't get it why does it matter if they are "different." You can compare For Honor with a fps game too, or I can compare SC2 with CS:GO. Obviously these two examples are extreme, and you can only compare very basic things such as like playerbase, graphics, community, learning curve, how game mechanincs and different playstyles affecting your gameplay (for example you can have a defensive playstyle in any of these games).

Regarding Mordhau and For Honor, they are completely different? Both are medieval games with CQC mechanics and such. Yes you can't compare then in depth because they are indeed completely different.
OP asked which is better, not which has better high lvl 1v1 potential.

no no you cant thats like saying witcher is better then dark souls.....they are not even on the same lvl....

Why I can't say it's better for me? I'm not saying that either of them is better than the other, but you can find PLENTY people saying that witcher is better than dark souls and vice versa.
The most important thing in these is that YOU decide which is better for YOU. In gaming industry its very rare imo when you can say objectively that one game is better than another.