What does centurion say during eagles talon

[Csx39]

He say something while jumping then when he backs off he waves his hand forward so I would guess he says Bring it or something along those lines

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: Landwalker04

Автор сообщения: LuNi

Female warden has even better lines. "Ti secabo" I'll cut you to pieces" can also be translated as "I'll castrate you"

* Te secabo (te being the accusative form of tu). But yeah, "I will cut you!" Or, I prefer, "I'm gonna cut ya [up]!"

That's right, although the voice actress is definitely saying "ti". A mispronunciation on her part.

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Centurion's voice lines are honestly kind of "meh", but at least he doesn't have gramatically incorrect ones like LB. Those trigger me.

[Csx39]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Centurion's voice lines are honestly kind of "meh", but at least he doesn't have gramatically incorrect ones like LB. Those trigger me.

non superstes

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Centurion's voice lines are honestly kind of "meh", but at least he doesn't have gramatically incorrect ones like LB. Those trigger me.

non superstes

Non superstes -> Ne supersteris
Ad mortem, inimicus -> Ad mortem, inimice

[Csx39]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

non superstes

Non superstes -> Ne supersteris
Ad mortem, inimicus -> Ad mortem, inimice

non

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Non superstes -> Ne supersteris
Ad mortem, inimicus -> Ad mortem, inimice

non

Oui, oui, je suis baguette mon mon.

[Saint Landwalker]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

non superstes

Non superstes -> Ne supersteris
Ad mortem, inimicus -> Ad mortem, inimice

Why ne supersteris? I don't see anything wrong with no superstes ("non" is obviously wrong, but that's not what it sounds like he's saying to me).

Inimicus is definitely wrong almost no matter how you slice that line.

[Csx39]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

non

Oui, oui, je suis baguette mon mon.

an baguette du fromage

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: Landwalker04

Why ne supersteris? I don't see anything wrong with no superstes ("non" is obviously wrong).

Superstes can be either the noun (survivor) or verb (lit: stand on top (survive))

If you want to say "no survivors", it should be "nullus superstes".

Ne supersteris means "you may not/will not survive"

No superstes = I, the survivor, swim

???

[Saint Landwalker]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: Landwalker04

Why ne supersteris? I don't see anything wrong with no superstes ("non" is obviously wrong).

Superstes can be either the noun (survivor) or verb (lit: stand on top (survive))

If you want to say "no survivors", it should be "nullus superstes".

Ne supersteris means "you may not/will not survive"

No superstes = I, the survivor, swim

???

Ah, I see what you're saying. Yeah, nullus superstes would have been better.

On the other hand, Medieval Latin was known for grammatically butchering Roman Latin, so I consider the in-game butchering to be historically appropriate. =P

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: Landwalker04

Ah, I see what you're saying. Yeah, nullus superstes would have been better.

On the other hand, Medieval Latin was known for grammatically butchering Roman Latin, so I consider the in-game butchering to be historically appropriate. =P

I think nullus superstes is even in the game, only not from LB.

And yeah, Medieval Latin butchered a lot of grammar/spelling, but I don't think even they used "no" as a negation. However:

"Non supersteris" may be correct in Medieval Latin, not sure. It's not in Classical Latin, at any rate. "Ne" is the negation used for this type of subjunctive (coniunctivus prohibitivus).

The difference is this:

Ne superstes = One may not survive
Ne supersteris = You may not survive

Present subjunctive = collective prohibition
Present perfect subjunctive = specific second person prohibition

So even if it is a case of them simply getting the negation "wrong", they utilized the wrong tense for this particular situation, as well.

[Csx39]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: Landwalker04

Ah, I see what you're saying. Yeah, nullus superstes would have been better.

On the other hand, Medieval Latin was known for grammatically butchering Roman Latin, so I consider the in-game butchering to be historically appropriate. =P

I think nullus superstes is even in the game, only not from LB.

And yeah, Medieval Latin butchered a lot of grammar/spelling, but I don't think even they used "no" as a negation. However:

"Non supersteris" may be correct in Medieval Latin, not sure. It's not in Classical Latin, at any rate. "Ne" is the negation used for this type of subjunctive (coniunctivus prohibitivus).

The difference is this:

Ne superstes = One may not survive
Ne supersteris = You may not survive

Present subjunctive = collective prohibition
Present perfect subjunctive = specific second person prohibition

So even if it is a case of them simply getting the negation "wrong", they utilized the wrong tense for this particular situation, as well.

im taking latin next year since i was bad at french
how u do dat

[Lv 20 Bolting Bot]

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

im taking latin next year since i was bad at french
how u do dat

Be prepared for lots of grammar, lol. You take the entire German/French grammar books in one semester of uni Latin. Pronunciation is really easy, though, but you don't speak it much.

[Csx39]

Автор сообщения: フォルケ様

Автор сообщения: csx39 YT

im taking latin next year since i was bad at french
how u do dat

Be prepared for lots of grammar, lol. You take the entire German/French grammar books in one semester of uni Latin. Pronunciation is really easy, though, but you don't speak it much.

nien superstes
did i pass

[Saint Landwalker]

Yeah, it's been almost 10 years since I studied Latin. Despite basically majoring in it, there's been some... atrophy.

Yes, I'm a old fart in For Honor Gamer terms.