Ryse: Son of Rome

Ryse: Son of Rome

Statistiche:
Terrible professional reviews but 83% positive user reviews
This does not compute. See Metacritic. the PC version did not get a SINGLE positive review. Yet, on Steam, 83% of user reviews are positive. Do I smell some shenanigans? Does anyone have a credible explanation for this?

Thanks!
Ultima modifica da himmatsj; 11 ott 2014, ore 22:59
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 20
Smells like Crytek did not pay for IGN. Btw, IGN does crappy reviews.
What the hell does IGN have got to do with this? http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/ryse-son-of-rome
don't trust metacritic: they ruin games!
It's an especific game. Imagine someone that hate space stories, and then ask this guy to review a game like "Destiny" he will surely say "crappy game".
Metacritic gives 10 to The last of Us. For me it's a crappy game. :)
I guess people that wouldn't like it on PC werre already warned off by the horrible Xbone version. Just wait for it to be a fiver and a lot more disappoinrted reviews will appear.
Ryse, for me it's better SOM. People complain about ryse "it's a short game" Well, there's a story, you must have skill. Som You have automatic parry/evade. Ryse, don't. And, seems that you haven't played. So...

Messaggio originale di himmatsj:
What the hell does IGN have got to do with this? http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/ryse-son-of-rome
Look at me auto 5k combo. I am DAMN GOOD PLAYING A GAME. The illusion never ends. That's why metacritic sux. :)
Messaggio originale di Vapor Games Brasil -Spartacvs:
Ryse, for me it's better SOM. People complain about ryse "it's a short game" Well, there's a story, you must have skill. Som You have automatic parry/evade. Ryse, don't. And, seems that you haven't played. So...

Messaggio originale di himmatsj:
What the hell does IGN have got to do with this? http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/ryse-son-of-rome

Better SOM?
Dude, if u see the meta list. See?
91 Kentucky Route Zero - Act III
91 Dark Souls II
90 Metro: 2033 Redux
87 Divinity: Original Sin
86 Astebreed
86 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
84 Metro Redux
81 Endless Legend
81 Wasteland 2
81 The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
81 Marvel Heroes 2015
80 Alien: Isolation
77 Watch Dogs
71 Dead Rising 3: Apocalypse Edition
70 The Sims 4
68 Lichdom: Battlemage
68 Stronghold: Crusader II
68 Gauntlet
65 Risen 3: Titan Lords
62 Planetary Annihilation
Well, think for yourself. Play before spread common sense. You cannot review what u did not play.
How can you not like this game. I think this scene is awsome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJ_13VD8D0k
long loading times <----xbone problems
framerate drops bad perf <-------xbone problems
repetitive combat <-------gets boring killing the same fat dude

8/10
Messaggio originale di Vapor Games Brasil -Spartacvs:
Smells like Crytek did not pay for IGN. Btw, IGN does crappy reviews.

This. You have a bunch of turds that didn't get free stuff bad mouthing it where the consumer actually appreciated what they received for the money. Not to mention the already flawed concept behind Metacritic in that it grabs specific reviewers... but not the same ones for all products. Therefore if say IGN hates strategy games, but their reviews get pulled for a strategy game... the score will always be lower.

Metacritic is garbage. I NEVER once bought a game or passed on one because of that score.
Graphicly it is the best I have ever seen. Gameplay isn't very good, combat gets very boring after a couple levels. Anyone praising this game as being great or tripple A are either graphics ♥♥♥♥♥♥ or have very low expectations. Story s kinda meh too. It's an OK game that I am kinda enjoying for the scenary, that's about it.
Ultima modifica da eddie2010; 12 ott 2014, ore 1:14
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 20
Per pagina: 1530 50

Data di pubblicazione: 11 ott 2014, ore 22:40
Messaggi: 20