DOOM: The Dark Ages

DOOM: The Dark Ages

檢視統計資料:
9070 xt has poor ray-tracing performance
Just letting you guys know. What's worse is that the last gen AMD flagship model 7900 XTX has even worse ray-tracing performance than 9070 xt and that doesn't help with where 9070 xt stand in terms of ray tracing tech. This is particularly concerning because now it definitely seems like even a company like iD Software is leaning towards heavier usage of ray-tracing tech.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQB0i0v2mkg&t=1256s
最後修改者:tpowl1400; 3 月 6 日 下午 2:26
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言,共 15
MrStillwater 3 月 8 日 上午 1:45 
Reviews show that the 9070 series ray tracing is much improved from previous gens, and is generally on par with the 5070. As long as you're not running extreme RT settings you shouldn't have a problem.
tpowl1400 3 月 8 日 上午 5:25 
引用自 MrStillwater
Reviews show that the 9070 series ray tracing is much improved from previous gens, and is generally on par with the 5070. As long as you're not running extreme RT settings you shouldn't have a problem.

We'd just have to see how iD handles the degree of ray-tracing as in-game option or not. I just saw Black Wukong and that game seems to have degree slider of ray tracing option in-game so yeah that could be how Doom the Dark Ages will come out.
最後修改者:tpowl1400; 3 月 8 日 下午 2:27
Hopefully it's well optimized my b580 can run doom eternal at 160+ fps Max settings including ray tracing in 1440p
djcarey 3 月 8 日 下午 5:15 
Might as well go AMD this year but just no this stupid card isn't it like 12gb or somethin? LOL no thanks, imma get a 24gb or a 32gb.
Gear 3 月 8 日 下午 6:19 
My 4070ti 12g ray tracing on , everything maxed . Alienware 34" never drops lower than 165 fps on Eternal. No need to upgrade for these games at all. Even DA.
RMN 3 月 9 日 下午 12:25 
I upgraded my 7800 XT to a 9070 XT in part for TDA. While AMD still isn't up to nvidia RT performance, it is greatly improved. I can now run Eternal at max settings, including RT, and stay well above 100 FPS on my 4k/160 monitor. The 7800 was good at 4k/160, as long as RT was off.

I just got the card a few days ago, so limited time with it, but an hour of TAG 1 maxed out graphics it performed flawlessly.
最後修改者:RMN; 3 月 9 日 下午 12:26
tpowl1400 3 月 9 日 下午 1:20 
引用自 RMN
I upgraded my 7800 XT to a 9070 XT in part for TDA. While AMD still isn't up to nvidia RT performance, it is greatly improved. I can now run Eternal at max settings, including RT, and stay well above 100 FPS on my 4k/160 monitor. The 7800 was good at 4k/160, as long as RT was off.

I just got the card a few days ago, so limited time with it, but an hour of TAG 1 maxed out graphics it performed flawlessly.

9070 xt has a bit better or equal rasterization as 4070 ti super, while RT capability of 4070 ti or so? But FSR 4 with ray tracing-to-date by AMD should be what AMD should push game devs to adopt!
最後修改者:tpowl1400; 3 月 9 日 下午 1:21
In the recommended specs ID lists a 6000 series AMD card. The 9070xt will more than likely be enough if that's what they recommend from AMD.
Avalanche 5 月 5 日 下午 9:46 
Very few games do RT well enough to care about it, not even Cyberpunk 2077 does it well enough to be worth using it.

I tend to turn it off when possible, but games like Avatar Frontiers of Pandora which funnily enough doesn't ruin the performance much, you can't turn it off, but they still run well, IF you can have FSR and FSR FG, its fine.....even more so if it has fsr 4.

But games like Spiderman 2.....even if FSR 4 and FG, you notice the slowdown.
Grampire (已封鎖) 5 月 6 日 上午 5:22 
While the 5070 ti is better than the 9070xt, its pretty marginal tbh. The biggest benefit between the two is DLSS 4 for the 5070 ti and potential for support with 4 AI frames between native ones, but that has drawbacks too like input lag.

From a dollar/value standpoint in terms of raytracing the 9070xt wins, as its a cheaper card with pretty comparable performance. However its impossible to find one at its lower MSRP of $750 and that likely wont change in the next year.

Since its currently priced about the same as a 5070 ti (950-1100 usd) you should go with the 5070 ti. If you find a 9070xt at 750 thats an amazing card for that price.
最後修改者:Grampire; 5 月 6 日 上午 5:23
引用自 Grampire
While the 5070 ti is better than the 9070xt, its pretty marginal tbh. The biggest benefit between the two is DLSS 4 for the 5070 ti and potential for support with 4 AI frames between native ones, but that has drawbacks too like input lag.

From a dollar/value standpoint in terms of raytracing the 9070xt wins, as its a cheaper card with pretty comparable performance. However its impossible to find one at its lower MSRP of $750 and that likely wont change in the next year.

Since its currently priced about the same as a 5070 ti (950-1100 usd) you should go with the 5070 ti. If you find a 9070xt at 750 thats an amazing card for that price.
I would argue the bigger benefit with 5070 Ti is much better 3D production app performance/stability, the neural texturing/rendering, mega geometry with cluster level acceleration structures, support for Linear Swept Spheres for better ray tracing of hair/grass, and the improved Shader Execution Reordering
Grampire (已封鎖) 5 月 6 日 上午 5:39 
引用自 spicy little monkey
引用自 Grampire
While the 5070 ti is better than the 9070xt, its pretty marginal tbh. The biggest benefit between the two is DLSS 4 for the 5070 ti and potential for support with 4 AI frames between native ones, but that has drawbacks too like input lag.

From a dollar/value standpoint in terms of raytracing the 9070xt wins, as its a cheaper card with pretty comparable performance. However its impossible to find one at its lower MSRP of $750 and that likely wont change in the next year.

Since its currently priced about the same as a 5070 ti (950-1100 usd) you should go with the 5070 ti. If you find a 9070xt at 750 thats an amazing card for that price.
I would argue the bigger benefit with 5070 Ti is much better 3D production app performance/stability, the neural texturing/rendering, mega geometry with cluster level acceleration structures, support for Linear Swept Spheres for better ray tracing of hair/grass, and the improved Shader Execution Reordering

Well, thats a lot more in-depth for sure, haha. I didnt know those were all additional features.

Still, the 9070xt seems like a good value proposition if you can find it at MSRP.
Akira. 5 月 12 日 上午 11:49 
the game is running fine on my 9070 xt, max settings
patrick68794 5 月 12 日 上午 11:51 
9070 XT's RT performance is generally pretty good for the price. It falls behind more in path traced games but really the new midrange GPUs still aren't quite ready for that without upscaling and frame gen, even at 1080p.
最後修改者:patrick68794; 5 月 12 日 上午 11:51
gamegpu 5 月 12 日 下午 1:19 
in 4k 7900 xtx and 9070 xt are equal in the game

https://en.gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/doom-the-dark-ages-test-gpu-cpu
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言,共 15
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 3 月 6 日 下午 2:17
回覆: 15