This game IS poorly optimized because it doesn't reach the promised performance on recommended hardware

[Atomas47]

Recently I posted that the game doesn't reach consistent 60 fps at 4k ultra on the hardware the developers recommend for such settings, but in this recent video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJCesMYZxGE
it is clear that the same is true for the recommended hardware (for playing at 1440p high settings 60 fps). Although the 7800xt (my gpu btw) is better than the recommended radeon 6800, it doesn't reach 60 fps at those settings.
This could be because of denuvo, but in any case, the developers/publisher are LYING to consumers.

[[{******---Dead4Life---******}]]

nah

[Virgo]

The real problem is that from low to ultra nightmere the difference is 13/15 fps. It is clearly a game designed with current consoles in mind

[Bonus]

I've still not found a benchmark that sees if the 6600 can get 1080p60 at the lowest settings.

[Enfant_Terrible]

What about the "Texture Pool Size" option ?!....How much FPS does that affect?

[Atomas47]

Originally posted by Enfant_Terrible:

What about the "Texture Pool Size" option ?!....How much FPS does that affect?

It should generally affect how much VRAM the game uses, not fps, unless you don't have enough VRAM

[Atomas47]

Originally posted by Bonus:

I've still not found a benchmark that sees if the 6600 can get 1080p60 at the lowest settings.

33 fps on 1080p ultra nightmare so don't expect over 45 fps on low settings without upscaling
(source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwFxv9KfIyc )

[Wylie28]

Originally posted by Enfant_Terrible:

What about the "Texture Pool Size" option ?!....How much FPS does that affect?

A LOT if you set it too high. Don't forget both DLSS AND RT uses a good chunk of VRAM too.

[ebolaconundrum]

You don't know what optimisation means I suspect. You people are boring. The game is extremely optimised.