Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Gameplay and performance > Looks. I woud gladly preferred raster graphics but with 120FPS, but nope I`ll have to upscale to reach such FPS...
Its not going to happen. We don't even know that the engine has any support for prebaked lighting.
Far as I'm concerned 60fps is great and 40 is ok. I don't need 200 fps to enjoy a game, I'm not a pigeon.
to 5070
Yes those sort of frame rates aren't about game play, they're about bragging right. You know an e-penis measuring contest.
Bad decision...
I'll shock you more im also happy at 1080p my monitors native resolution.
So for me this choice it's a big mistake, that's only my opinion.
For me it's better to have 50% more frame than reflection.
I'm only on a 2070 and at 1440p high settings with balanced DLSS it's performing just fine. idTech is incredibly well optimized, literally the best in the business -- nothing else comes close.