Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And even then you cannot turn everything to ultra.
I already watched a vid with the Indiana Jones game with somebody using a 4060, since that too has only 8GB of vram.
As the Indiana Jones game has almost the same requirements (both minimum and recommended), I'll just use that to predict how the Dark Ages will run.
When everything is set to ultra, the 4060 can only avg about 25 fps, because 8GB of vram isn't enough. However, if you tune the shadows and texture quality down to medium, yet keep all the other settings at ultra, the 4060 avg about 85 fps.
In short, your 3050 rtx can work, but only if you're willing to have all the settings turned to medium.
What's so surprising about the fact that you can't use 'Ultra' settings with a 3050? 😂😂 Is this really something that needs to be pointed out? 😂
Do you truly think that those who buy **90 cards, spending thousands of dollars just to play at the HIGH END side of the market, are idiots?
Ohhhhh, look—you can't enable extreme settings on a low-end card... Wow, shocking... 😂
The main game i am using it for right now is an indie game called The Elder scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered. With the game set to max graphics and hardware RT set to ultra i am able to get around 160 to 200+ fps at 2560x1600p resolution uncapped framerate . Of course it depends on a multitude of factors like the resolution you play at the fps you're used to getting , and then of course ray tracing and the settings you use in Lossless Scaling personally i prefer to use LS1 as it gives me better performance and higher frames.
if you're rockin an RTX 3050 tho, i would URGE you to have a look at the full system requirements chart (just google it) and check your CPU and RAM is enough too, they made the game disproportionately heavy (thanks ID for forcing RT in your game for no good ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ reason, "hit detection" is NOT a good reason and needlessly consumes VRAM in exchange for NOTHING that couldn't have been done with a rasterised fallback that had the exact same feature set)
you should not be running ultra on games on low end hardware. ultra is ment for entry level high end hardware. a 3050 is low entry.
Probably will be a similar situation here - you shouldn't be maxing the game out anyway if performance is a true concern. If you want it to look like a tech demo with extra details you won't see without staring - sure, max out the settings but don't expect it to run perfectly. Especially for those wanting to play at 4k or have FPS above 100.