Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
40 hours would be worth it IMO. But I'm willing to bet that once you know exactly where to go (after multiple playthroughs), the whole campaign would be only 9 hours, give or take. And that's not worth $70.
How does this make any sense? You can not blame the game for being only 9 hours, hypothetical number pulled out of your ass anyway, when you have already played and completed it several times so you know where to go exactly and how to deal with each enemy effectively. You need to count those earlier playthroughs into the overall time as well /facepalm
I used the 9 hours because according to the howlongtobeat site, a 100% run takes about 16 hours. But that's assuming a BLIND run. Once you know exactly where to go for every level, the length tends to get cut in half.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7C699QueWM
I just decided to watch the opening cut scenes on YouTube.
I still need to play eternal anyway so I buy eternal next then hopefully once I'm done with eternal I will buy this at a value price.
I just don't feel like participating in the creation of "new normals" that are going to make gaming worse down the road. I'm sure all games will soon be 80 bucks regardless but hey, at least i can say i wasn't part of the problem.