安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
I never commented on your bombs=mortars thing and i don't believe i ever said
"Somethign which is Evolved dont mean its the same like your stupidity"
Welcome to the internet. Lol
But no seriously this has gotten a little off track hasn't it.
In page 2 LAG, joined by his friend geek, remy and alphafer (who all post within minutes of each other) have managed to derail the topic even further to be a pure discussion on quality of life change vs balance changes.
In page 3 we have comments from LAG like: "you're just bad", "do you english" as being constructive to the original post and we have alphafret educating you on the damage a ion shotgun does. Again, very constructive to the original post I guess.
In page 4 we have LAG calling others "trolls" and a discussion about differen't builds which ends with LAG educating everyone on creative builds that are effective. All on topic with the original post.
Page 5 we have the return of the other 3 white knight shills to defend and agree with everything LAG has said, while insulting anyone else that dares to disagree with them. We have more indepth explanations from LAG, about why LAG is always correct.
And page 6 has ended with 2 of the people against the current state of the game becoming confused as to who actually insulted them, well I can tell you it was geek and the other white knights. Page 6 ends with LAG making 3 seperate replies instead of just 1 which all are of educational purpose.
4 white knight shills that have completely and utter derailed this thread simple because it's a negative thread about the state of the game... But because they're white knight shills and therefore potential mod material, they're allowed to do it without challenge.
Well I'll challenge you, by pointing how and why you consistantly derail these types of topics. Because your 'white knight shills' that's why and I'm sure a member of 'staff' will come along shortly and tell us how you aren't a white knight shill.
I'll probably be punished for pointing this out, or the thread will get locked because I've pointed it out. Such is the favourtism that goes on in the toxic Robocraft Steam forums.
Cant you see it?? He is trolling-destroying every fcking community discussion.
My apology then sir/lady.
I already left, let me know if they retire the Epic Fail update :)
Also leave a negative review as feedback. Not only is it important to do this it's also quite funny to see all the bad reviews.
"Pride before a fall"
I still think it's funny to see all the negative reviews. Pride before a fall.
People liked that system. It felt more like progress as opposed to luck.
GC removal I'm okay with because it was more pay-to-win then. EDIT: see the last paragraph before the second quote.
What I'm not okay with is how they're basically trying to promote gambling. It's pathetic, they're now copying other games and blatantly trying to get people to spend as much money as they can squeeze out of them. Premium a year ago felt like supporting an indie game, now it just seems like a way to keep people spending money.
That's just my opinion, though. It would be less shameful for them as a company to just put GC back, because at least that was honest and you got what you paid for.
That quality of life vote, which seems like them trying to make an effort to connect with people and let the community have influence over something.
The thing is that they aren't giving us a choice of what goes into the game - they're just giving us the choice of what order it goes in.
I can understand ignoring the "omg game sux pls revert!!" comments, but if you read the top review (is is the top review? It's a really long one near the top at least) on the store page, that's a well thought-out piece that says something pretty interesting about FJ: evidently the guy was a moderator who was kicked off for voicing an opinion - not that there's any proof of that, but it's something to note.
It all comes down to greed in the end. I know I won't be spending money on it anytime soon. Everyone can do what they want with their money, but I just wish people would see what FJ has turned into.