There's an extreme lack of blood/gore in this game.

[Kрис]

You shoot enemies, no bullet holes, no blood anywhere unless you shoot them right next a wall, that thing that CoD does. Bullet holes appear on dead civilians when you shoot them though which is strange. Blow someone up with an RPG their body just disappears, no blood or anything. It's really unsatisfying and I feel that it takes away from the experience a little.

[ULTRA]

Example 27 of 543 of how this game resembles the 80s instead of the next gen

[-Zimbi]

Would be cool if big chunks blew off them like in Wolfenstein: The New order

[Nova225]

Interestingly I remember shooting a tiger with the single shot grenade launcher and watched it chunk.

Unlike some games though, the chunks just dissapear and the bloodstains are barely noticable.

[Eriksen]

Chris Tbh původně napsal:

You shoot enemies, no bullet holes, no blood anywhere unless you shoot them right next a wall, that thing that CoD does. Bullet holes appear on dead civilians when you shoot them though which is strange. Blow someone up with an RPG their body just disappears, no blood or anything. It's really unsatisfying and I feel that it takes away from the experience a little.

If i shot you with an RPG iam pretty sure you would disappear to

[ULTRA]

Eriksen původně napsal:

Chris Tbh původně napsal:

You shoot enemies, no bullet holes, no blood anywhere unless you shoot them right next a wall, that thing that CoD does. Bullet holes appear on dead civilians when you shoot them though which is strange. Blow someone up with an RPG their body just disappears, no blood or anything. It's really unsatisfying and I feel that it takes away from the experience a little.

If i shot you with an RPG iam pretty sure you would disappear to

no

[Kooch66]

I completely agree (based on videos and such). I stopped playing Far Cry 3 because of this and have skipped 4 so far because of it. Games in general don't need blood and gore to be good, but if you're going to make a game where 99% of the gameplay is shooting people it needs to be visceral and this is anything but. It's more like an old light gun shooter on genesis with some dumb ragdoll tossed it. Just really kills the atmosphere.

[FTL_FAM]

I use the grenade launcher all the time (have the game on UPlay + PS4) and it gibs every single time with a direct hit. The victims explode into giant paint-ball splatter-like explosions of red goo. No joke.

The ironic thing is this is an M-Rated game.

I think they probably don't do excessive gore simply because there is so much going on at any given moment that it might be too taxing on the game if they did add bullet wounds and other realistic damage?

[FEEP]

JConnor původně napsal:

I use the grenade launcher all the time (have the game on UPlay + PS4) and it gibs every single time with a direct hit. The victims explode into giant paint-ball splatter-like explosions of red goo. No joke.

The ironic thing is this is an M-Rated game.

I think they probably don't do excessive gore simply because there is so much going on at any given moment that it might be too taxing on the game if they did add bullet wounds and other realistic damage?

Not on the game. More like the computer. I mean come on, most PC users have decent PC's I would like more gore.

[Chew Ass and Kick Bubblegum]

Chris Tbh původně napsal:

You shoot enemies, no bullet holes, no blood anywhere unless you shoot them right next a wall, that thing that CoD does.

This pathetic anti-COD stereotype again...
You knew that in WaW, BO, BOI (basically all treyarch CODs) you can shoot off parts of bodies? As well as burn them? Most of the soldiers will fall down on ground, and shout in slow pain of death, then slowly drop their head and losing strengh on the ground and die?


But yes, I agree, at least bullet holes would be good in FC4. But nothing I would complain about, it doesn't matter that much.

[KilluH]

yeah there is no blood its completly sanitized. because nobody bleeds when shot full of holes in india

[Empath64]

Deathanimations are great, enough blood in my opinion! Enemies vanishing in bloodfountains (e.g. grenadelauncher), dark rituals, bloody stealthkills, bloody animalskinning...open up your eyes. This is not Wolfenstein, but it's bloody and brutal in its own way. I don't need more blood. It has been perfectly utilised in Farcry. If you need more blood and gore, play Wolfenstein. ;o)

[Sparhawk122]

Aesthetics like blood is an after-thought due to the consoles not having the raw power to have visceral gore in such open world games like Far Cry and such. Look at games like Dragon Age, there's some to no blood. however enemies can explode into chunks that very quickly disappear anyway. Because it's not a feature the consoles could support and still have the game play smoothly they overlook the fact that they can add in these extra aesthetics in the PC versions. This is yet another instance of these supposed new gen consoles holding PC gaming back. If there weren't consoles then games for PC would be much better utilised and we would have much better playing and looking games then what we have at the present. Far Cry is supposed to be a violent game. Here in Australia it is rated for 18 and above which gives the Devs free rain to add in as much blood as they well please. Also Wolfenstein: The New Order got best FPS of the year, so obviously ID have got the right of it in the gore and game-play department. Gore sells games.