Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So even if you ramp up the difficulty, the AI doesn't improve, it just gives them more units and resources, but they will still do stupid ♥♥♥♥ with it and this can be exploited to make it trivial.
Consider playing vs the AI as a tutorial and then play some hotseat or online multiplayer to experience the real deal :)
Good luck & Have fun.
The AI will always be stupid, but the maps will begin to stack the initial starting conditions and win conditions against you more and more, plus, the fog of war will become more and more of an issue on unfamiliar maps, as knowledge is power on HoMM maps, and ignorance is death.
If you reject the single player campaigns based on ease of winning the beginner's maps, you are making a mistake as far as condemning the game based on "lack of challenge". You need to play a bit farther and get a bit more experience with just how frustratingly "impossible" HoMM can be before you say it's "easy" based on beginner's maps. Experienced players will laugh at that.
True Indeed !
Chronicles were desinged as extended tutorials for new players and for the lore, not RoE. In RoE AI was bugged and just plain stupid. Also campaign design wasn't as good as in extensions to offer any challenge.