Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well it's full name is Turritopsis dohrnii and is otherwise known as the Immortal Jellyfish. It has the unique trait whereby if it is injured or starved it will revert back to being a polyp which is a younger stage of its life-cycle. It will then regenerate back to being an adult as long as it isn't killed while in this state. Their name is somewhat misleading since they can die from disease and old-age but it is their regenerative qualities that are of great interest to researchers.
They are known to appear the Med but also around the coast of Japan which is odd since the Hisa Maru was docked in Hong Kong which is a long way from where these jelly fish normally live. Given the secrecy, I would presume that they were gathering these jellyfish and transporting these jellyfish without permission of the authorities.
But anyway, this now explains that the monsters are genetic accidents caused by an experimental mixture intended to promote cellular repair and regeneration. I guess Dr Zhao somehow felt that Checkov and Wildon would not survive their injuries and made the desperate attempt to save their lives - then regretted the consequences.
The nice thing is that this also explains why the Hunter looks like a jellyfish.
Other than that, yeah, you summed up the story :)
Good job!
That does raise the possibility that somehow the jelly fish had mutated into the Hunter and that is what broke out of 106 and subsequently caused the boiler to malfunction due to moving around the ship using the pipes and vents. If that is the case then it's an area of the story which needs some further development to clarify what caused a bunch of random jellyfish in a tank to turn into a mutant.
There is fact that this jelly fish was not fully studied until the 90's so it is possible that the writer was playing on the fact it was a relatively unresearched species to say that they can turn into these horrible monsters when kept in containment. One of the notes mention them becoming more active at night and needing frequent checks to ensure that they don't exhibit any 'unknown' behavior.
While I am perfectly happy with things not being explained, when there is an effort to frame these kinds of monsters with an origin story I kind of expect that to be followed through with. Personally I prefer the more SCP-style of monsters and wierd things which are never explained and you have to simply accept that they defy all understanding.
You can't implement a hovering thing in the notes without loosing the reality aspect. But as i mentioned in another thread Monstrum isn't about realism. There is an explanation that fits to 2 monsters, but its vague and someone who plays casually won't even notice or care about the details behind the monsters :D
Thats why it looses the reality aspect. I mean yes, there is an explanation how he got his "powers", but there is no evidence in the real world. So you could argue that mutations in the real world wouldn't go as far as here in Monstrum, its still a fictional game, so i "accept" (sounds weird, i don't know any better word right now haha :D ) the creation of the Fiend in the notes as they are ^^
First of all, although the Wilson discrepancy is obvious (and very odd), what proof is there that the 'female voice' is Dr Zhao? I don't understand how those are connected.
Also, if Subjects 1 and 2 are Wilson and Checkov, how come the Lab Report ends with the phrase 'additional refinement before human trials' in the face of the failures of the subjects? Wilson and Checkov are human, so this doesn't add up.
I'd also be careful with any dating of Feb 11th, 12, or 13th. The timeline here makes sense but there is no definitive proof that those events occurred on those dates exactly (and please prove me wrong if I've missed evidence that invalidates my conclusions!)
Finally, in response to the comments (hello again Naiden! And nice to meet the thread-creator ^^), in my interpretation of things at first I found that its possible that all three monsters are referenced in the lore:
The Brute is obvious - in the majority of the notes and audio logs there are references to heat and fire causing the problems with the boiler/showers, which we obviously associate with the Brute's appearance (a molten humanoid scorching from the inside) in addition to the explosion in container 106 (you can't tell me that isn't a reference to The Old Man haha) and of course the 'increased muscle growth' and 'aggression'. He's all over the place.
The Hunter meanwhile is in Mills and Stuart's story. Hints of the presence of the Hunter (who I've heard is female? That means they can't be Wilson or Checkov :'D) through the description of the vent cover that matches certain elements of Hunter gameplay ('think they're coming in from the vents but must be huge, they've managed to bust the cover' - Mills).
The Fiend's game mechanics match some descriptions from Note 19, where Fred mentions 'issues with power in a few areas' to Kim in addition to doors getting stuck. We also read about an entire power out in Note 8, forcing Fred to fax Carlson.
I also think its possible Note 17's Lab Report references the Fiend - increased brain activity 'outside pre-determined parameters' sounds kinda like his psionic and telekinetic powers mentioned above. The tricky bit is this - which two are the ones from the Lab Report (assuming the Subjects are indeed the monsters we meet in-game) and which one is left out? Why?
We do have 3 'expeditions' mentioned between '1' and '2', and 3 monsters to match. Even if we ignore the Hunter's gender (don't let this become Funtime Foxy lmao, if you know you know) and the 'additional refinement before human trials' detail - after all we already have a Wilson inconsistency - there are large gaps in the origin of at least one of the monsters, if not all three!
There's a lot left unsaid and I'm hoping Monstrum 2 will do what FNaF SL/FFPS/TFC did for the Freddy's franchise (but better) and dive into the science-fiction of how the Monsters came to be, as well as maybe introducing a bunch of new ones! If there were 2 'viable' specimens from the first expedition, and SIX from the second, how many more from the third?? These have not all been accounted for.
And as with any good horror game, who IS the player? xD
Welp, that's long enough. I won't bother you with a longer response, thanks for reading and do debate these points with me!
well um
if ya wanna talk more its all in the game I guess