Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The player(s) actually do defensive duties, tracking back into the box, getting interceptions as well as pressing higher up the pitch, winning the ball back and starting attacking moves, basically what the BWM was supposed to do.
Is the BWM position broken or perhaps is it best used in an actual DM position, perhaps as part of a 3 man central midfield?
Technically I play 4 in midfield but the two wide men occupy the AMR and AML roles as Inside Forwards but yeah, see your point, most do like to pack their midfield tight.
It is true this is not designed to be an Iron Curtain tactic, it is a goalscoring and controlling tactic and I do accept goals will happen.
What bothers me though is how broken the BWM position seems to be. Average of 6.0 - 6.6 a game irritates the hell out of me but what irritates me more is how the game seems to pass them by. I knew in 2014 this position was broken and the CM - Defence was better (kept shape better), seems this year this has not been fixed (Note: From my experience, could be it does great in another formation).
DLP - Defend seems to fair better. They actually track back, get into the box, get interceptions as well as press and tackle up the field, overall get more involved. Ratings are not that far improved. Seen from 5.8 - 8.9 but average around 6.8 - 7.2.
I have testing on Premiership teams and players such as Romero and the results are actually not that different, the defensive Mid tends to get lower ratings.
I do wonder if this is just how the rating systems work, defensive types will always get low ratings because the game doesn't take into account what they do (i.e a tackle that leads to a pass to a winger who crosses to a striker that leads to a goal is an example of a player doing a great job but the game seems to think "meh")? Since I now changed to DLP - D I have been much more solid defensivly, even keeping a couple of cleansheets or conceding the odd goal in the 80+ min.
Now I know he does a great job but it gets irritating when fans start calling for player to be dropped.
One way to "game" the system in a sense I have found is having the DM to take corners. I play with short corners (basically he passes to a guy just inside the box) so corner stat is irrelevant. I did this in the lower leagues and could bump up ratings into 7's due to what I believe is goal scoring opportunity passes and a few assists. However, now I am in the championship (and Uefa cup yay) I have stopped since I want more defence against a counter-attack so no longer a realistic option.
Best position: DM - Deep lying playmaker
Consistent 85-90% passing completion.
9-11 Tackling rate
I think its just how the game works. It rewards more "offensive" or "positive" play that usually leads to goals. Like Lucas Romero in my save:
Consistent 85-90% passing completion.
9-11 Tackling rate
His ratings rarely goes above 7.3 or 7.2 unless he scores or assist.
The BWM role is to disrupt plays and cycle possession and usually not involve in offensive plays. Thats how this kind of player will get low ratings eventough he racks up some good stats. Imagine players like Gattuso, Keane or Gilberto Silva or Sami Khedira.