Performance Analysis by pcgamer.com

[MSK02]

https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/final-fantasy-7-rebirth-pc-best-settings-performance-analysis

[Hana Ahri]

Shame that this will run on Steam Deck but not on something much faster like GTX 1660 Super. Well, I guess we'll have to wait for modders to save our day.

[aeternox]

glad 5090 is just around the corner no better time to upgrade

[Iron Reaper]

idk man i'm really not impressed with the 50xx series. i think i'll just skip this one

[aeternox]

Originally posted by Iron Reaper:

idk man i'm really not impressed with the 50xx series. i think i'll just skip this one

i think the one that just kicks everyone's arses is 5070 = 4090 with only $500

[Wakane]

Steam Deck HD Review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uAVJZLENfk

[Scarlet Crusade]

Considering I’m fine with “the game works and runs well”, I don’t see any real issues.

There’s likely to be mods to bump up the FPS for in-game cutscenes like there was for FFXVI if you need them to run at 120FPS, but 60FPS is already better than 30FPS like they were in FFXVI.

But considering the actual FMVs are always going to be 30FPS regardless, I feel like playing the game at 120FPS is creating a distraction all on its own. 4K60 is my target and I believe I’ll hit it.

[Iron Reaper]

Originally posted by aeternox:

Originally posted by Iron Reaper:

idk man i'm really not impressed with the 50xx series. i think i'll just skip this one

i think the one that just kicks everyone's arses is 5070 = 4090 with only $500

that's true. hmmmmm

[TheBigStan]

Originally posted by Hana Ahri:

Shame that this will run on Steam Deck but not on something much faster like GTX 1660 Super. Well, I guess we'll have to wait for modders to save our day.

The 16 series cards support shaders 6.6 and dx12u features such as direct storage mentioned in the review. So, i think gtx 16 will run it.

[kiteless 凧無し]

steam deck is a toaster, why is anyone expecting anything to run well on it

[Cookie]

Originally posted by aeternox:

Originally posted by Iron Reaper:

idk man i'm really not impressed with the 50xx series. i think i'll just skip this one

i think the one that just kicks everyone's arses is 5070 = 4090 with only $500

The 5070 is NOT equal to a 4090 on rasterization performance. It achieves that performance with DLSS4 aka frame generation. Don't be fooled by Nvidia's marketing.

[Grimzy]

I do not trust these so called "performance analasys" articles, because so far, every single game, ran better than what they indicated so i take those with a big grain of salt.

[aeternox]

Originally posted by Cookie:

Originally posted by aeternox:

i think the one that just kicks everyone's arses is 5070 = 4090 with only $500

The 5070 is NOT equal to a 4090 on rasterization performance. It achieves that performance with DLSS4 aka frame generation. Don't be fooled by Nvidia's marketing.

i hope so, coz the moment it turns out to be the truth, all 4090 owners are getting salted on their arses

[Cookie]

Originally posted by aeternox:

Originally posted by Cookie:

The 5070 is NOT equal to a 4090 on rasterization performance. It achieves that performance with DLSS4 aka frame generation. Don't be fooled by Nvidia's marketing.

i hope so, coz the moment it turns out to be the truth, all 4090 owners are getting salted on their arses :d2tidehunter:

It is expected that the 5070 is going to be only 10-15% faster in traditional rendering than the 4070, even the most recent Nvidia performance comparison chart confirms that, so don't get your hopes up.

[Scarlet Crusade]

If you can’t tell the difference between “real” frames and frame generation, then does it really matter?

[Cookie]

Originally posted by Scarlet Crusade:

If you can’t tell the difference between “real” frames and frame generation, then does it really matter?

Except you can. It's a ghosting and blurry mess.