Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
get a 4070 just to be safe.
FF16 literally sent my 3070 to RMA, and it took a 4070 to run the damn game smoothly.... capped FPS of course.
Yet I ran the game fine on a 2080...
I also have a 3070 but since i'm going to play on a 3440 x 1440p display I really don't know what kind of performance i'll get.
Humm it's going to be pretty though vram wise for sure judging the needed vram towards the 4k definition. 12go for 1440p so yes would expect for taking no rtisk to put not above medium textures or low ? depending on the final result.
Texture quality is one of the rare settings that is "free" ONLY if your vram can handle it. If so yes no performance downgrade i mean BIG ones. Same is true for shadows quality (not be confuse with the shadow cache witch is very useful too).
Personally i kow i will be fine but because i have a 3090 FE (so 24go of vram)
Pretty sure that they are using direct storage or i should say RTX I/O for Nvidia card (marketing name for Nvidia own direct storage implementation)
You can clearly see that for the not much ram needed and ancient old cpu (i mean my 9900K is literaly a Skylake architecture from 2016 technically still in 14nm+++ )
However i wonder just if you are bottleneck with your ssd on say 3.0 pci-e... but we will find out.