Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't think that'd qualify as "decent picture quality", especially with framegen and fsr and such, maybe it's decent when you're not moving ? ;p
The irony is with the work you seem to have put in there, you could've done odd jobs for a gpu.
Really curious to see this "decent" picture quality, especially in movement.
how about no ?
Yeah I really wonder why he's wasting marketable skills like that ;p
I think the title would fit better if it says "Cheapest workaround for GTX 16x cards to play this game"