FINAL FANTASY VII REBIRTH

FINAL FANTASY VII REBIRTH

View Stats:
What performance should I expect?
I'm thinking about preordering it due the 30% off but I have some doubts about performance. (155GB also discourages me)
I have Ryzen 5 7600, 16GB ddr5 ram and rx 7600.
I have a 1440p 27" monitor, will I get at least 60 fps on mid settings using also super resolution and/or fsr? (I still haven't figured out how afmf2 works)
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
FSR will not be in the game. If you get under 60 fps, frame gen is kind of useless the latency will be too bad. You probably will have to play at 1080p
Last edited by 8-Bit Ears; Jan 2 @ 8:27am
Originally posted by 8-Bit Ears:
FSR will not be in the game. If you get under 60 fps, frame gen is kind of useless the latency will be too bad. You probably will have to play at 1080p
It will not be in the game at launch or in general? I hope there will be mods that adds it. Will super resolution upscale do the thing? I have a 1080p 60hz second monitor, but color are pretty bad (it is a tv tbh)
Originally posted by pado:
Originally posted by 8-Bit Ears:
FSR will not be in the game. If you get under 60 fps, frame gen is kind of useless the latency will be too bad. You probably will have to play at 1080p
It will not be in the game at launch or in general? I hope there will be mods that adds it. Will super resolution upscale do the thing? I have a 1080p 60hz second monitor, but color are pretty bad (it is a tv tbh)

Well its not official, but they specifically mention DLSS support so its safe to assume there is no fsr support at launch anyway. Its pretty rare for a game to add more upscaling options post launch
Mathias Jan 2 @ 11:16am 
It's optimised for console, as long as your hardware is mid range and not more than five years old you should get a steady 60fps at 1.5/2k.

Edit: using a similar engine for previous game which I run at 120fps at 2k with crappier hardware than you, you should be fine, bro.
Last edited by Mathias; Jan 2 @ 11:17am
Guybrush Jan 2 @ 12:01pm 
Why people still want or even need for "in game FSR" if every AMD can use FSR from Adrenalin driver? Also adrenalin driver guarantees the latest FSR possible. So why don't people use it? Just enable FSR from the driver, create any resolution below the native and use it. It's perfect. So much better than basic in games options (quality, performance...). You can create thousands of custom resolutions from close to 100% to 10% if you want.
Gnome Jan 2 @ 4:41pm 
Same performance as FFXVI
Originally posted by 8-Bit Ears:
FSR will not be in the game. If you get under 60 fps, frame gen is kind of useless the latency will be too bad. You probably will have to play at 1080p
frame gen is good on single player games as long as you use a controller.
Originally posted by Gnome:
Same performance as FFXVI
then it should run decently, thanks
Well you got to look at this way, this is a game by Square they do NOT know how to optimise their games or do actual good PC ports. Square are actually worse than UbIsoft for porting and optimising their games. Just look at how bad their recent output has been FFXVI, FFXV, FF Stranger Of Paradise, Romancing Saga Revenge Of Seven and a number of others all badly done ports to PC.
Last edited by I FARTED AND I KILLED MY HAMSTER; Jan 3 @ 3:58am
Originally posted by Guybrush:
Why people still want or even need for "in game FSR" if every AMD can use FSR from Adrenalin driver? Also adrenalin driver guarantees the latest FSR possible. So why don't people use it? Just enable FSR from the driver, create any resolution below the native and use it. It's perfect. So much better than basic in games options (quality, performance...). You can create thousands of custom resolutions from close to 100% to 10% if you want.

Resolution scaling and FSR are completely different things. They both are really bad though. But a game HAS to have FSR implemented by the devs to work, the resolution scaling you are talking about is not FSR
Guybrush Jan 3 @ 10:51am 
Originally posted by 8-Bit Ears:
Originally posted by Guybrush:
Why people still want or even need for "in game FSR" if every AMD can use FSR from Adrenalin driver? Also adrenalin driver guarantees the latest FSR possible. So why don't people use it? Just enable FSR from the driver, create any resolution below the native and use it. It's perfect. So much better than basic in games options (quality, performance...). You can create thousands of custom resolutions from close to 100% to 10% if you want.

Resolution scaling and FSR are completely different things. They both are really bad though. But a game HAS to have FSR implemented by the devs to work, the resolution scaling you are talking about is not FSR
It is?

From official site:

"Radeon™ Super Resolution (RSR) is an in-driver upscaling feature that uses the same algorithm found in AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution (FSR) technology."

So, please, stop. You are complete wrong.
https://www.amd.com/en/products/software/adrenalin/radeon-super-resolution.html

And it is probably better than FSR in game because it is on drive and updated every driver version.
RSR uses the same algorithm as fsr 1.0. RSR is a great solution for those that need it, but lets not bs and call it something its not. Just because Adrenalin updates, that doesnt automatically mean RSR is upgraded alongside it. "probably better" further proving you are in fact the one who doesn't know what they're talking about.
Originally posted by Buddyrhys:
RSR uses the same algorithm as fsr 1.0. RSR is a great solution for those that need it, but lets not bs and call it something its not. Just because Adrenalin updates, that doesnt automatically mean RSR is upgraded alongside it. "probably better" further proving you are in fact the one who doesn't know what they're talking about.
Based on reddit anonomous posts? Nice. Official documentation is nothing on now days.
Bye.
Xenu Jan 4 @ 12:04am 
Final Fantasy is my favorite series ever and I had to refund FF16 because it was too awful FPS wise. FF15 also runs like crap on my PC (Stranger of Paradise also crap) so thinking about buying a PS5 at this point lmao.

FF7 remake did run well so i'm just not sure what to do. If it's the same engine at FF16 forget it.
Last edited by Xenu; Jan 4 @ 12:05am
V3RG1L Jan 4 @ 12:32am 
Originally posted by Xenu:
Final Fantasy is my favorite series ever and I had to refund FF16 because it was too awful FPS wise. FF15 also runs like crap on my PC (Stranger of Paradise also crap) so thinking about buying a PS5 at this point lmao.

FF7 remake did run well so i'm just not sure what to do. If it's the same engine at FF16 forget it.
ff7 remake and rebirth are both running on the same engine which is UE4 while ff16 is using a different engine called luminous engine
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 2 @ 7:31am
Posts: 28