Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
You don't have to kill a character to deal with him C: you could just steal his gear, strip him before attaking him or just use that spell card on him which makes him flee from each fight ... really fun to use it in the morning, right before the guard's turns. (don't have the name in english).
Sure, Sylas is a powerful fighter but having a high bounty on his head makes him the favorite target of spell/trickery cards users and that's why I think he doesn't need any nerf at all. He's my favorite puppet when I play Elyssa or Sargon because I know I'll have an easy way to get prestige/coins during the entire game. Playing him against three spell/trickery users must be a nightmare ...
Not to mention Sylas is tied for highest base body, which makes him more resilient to spells than average. Almost any time you kill Sylas with spells, you can safely assume any other hero would have died too while potentially requiring less resources.
This depends entirely on who is playing Sylas. I find 4 spirit over 3 to be a very good investment in most games regardless of the hero I'm using. 1 more spirit can let you cast two spells instead of one which also means you're drawing another card when you otherwise wouldn't. It's also increasing your spell range by a third. Drawing a bunch of spells once you have good enough gear is great on Sylas (or any hero really) because you deprive enemies of some cards they hope to draw against you and you're drawing good stuff you can use. Sylas can even surpass every fighter except Brun in terms of spell casting power because he can use amethyst. Sylas can very well be a better fighter and mage than whatever hero you picked.
The whole topic is about Sylas passive so I don't see your point. And to balance a character, you have to compare it to other characters, right? Or else it's not balancing anymore.
It's not like Sylas automatically gets +3 sword when he spawns. What if there's no guards nearby? What if he gets killed by a guard because of bad/no gear or simply RNG? His passive gives alot for taking risks or nothing for playing safe. (and by risks, I don't even think about attacking guards but potentially becoming everyone's spell/trickery cards target)
I mean ffs mercurio only steals 1 gold and horace's only power is a glorified false orders
Too be honest, I'd rather see him getting more gold, but not from another player, than dealing with this low ability... it's actually not that good, especially if the player in question has no gold to begin with...
Or maybe the stealing should also accor after winning a battle? much like Twiss's stealing?
I would like to see Mercurio steal gold when he both captures a settlement, AND when a player captures Mercurios settlement, will really make people second guess taking his stuff.
True, Sylas is more likely to lose hp from guard attacks simply because he fights them more. However, he is less likely to be attacked by heroes because many times it's suicidal. Sylas runs a greater risk of being damaged by guards, usually the weakest creatures on the board offensively, in exchange for scaring off other heroes, the biggest offensive threats that can attack you 3 times in one turn. High kill potential can also save him hp against any opponent by making sure he doesn't have to fight an enemy multiple times.
3 wits is common for fight heroes. River, Barnaby and Zosha are the only major fighters with 4 wits, and they all either have less gold than Sylas or a hero power that makes cycling harder. Sylas doesn't have a noteworthy gear drawing disadvantage compared to other combat heroes. Anyone who is ok with 3 wits, can also just use resist to hit the 3 shield sweet spot quickly and consistently. It's easier to justify resist on Sylas than Brun, Thane or Magna because his power doesn't need wits to get value. As a side note, I like topaz more than serendibite. Part of it is because of the reason you mention. I also see gold as less important when I can consistently fight guards because I don't really need much gold once I have good enough gear to fight.
My point is that you can't just say something like "Sylas loses to spells and trickery" without going into details. If you say spells are Sylas' weakness, you need to say how he is easier to kill than average with spells or how he'll be in a worse spot than another hero in a similar situation.
Sylas does lose his power once he dies. This is a fairly unique disadvantage as only Brun shares it. However, every combat power is usually useless immediately after death. The major problem with death is that you are no longer where you were. Piercing sword burns won't stop someone in the palace when you're 2 turns away. Reflects don't get you to your quest. You still need time to get in range of the enemy to use your power. There isn't any practical difference between something being present or absent when it can't be used either way. Is Sylas slightly worse off when he dies? Sure, but is it by a big enough margin to balance out his advantages compared to other heroes? No, death thoroughly neutralizes every combat hero anyway.
Every hero can be killed by npcs getting an explosion chain and has times when their power is bad or not active. What if Thane doesn't have sword burns? What if Brun's dice miss? What if Scarlet can't get to the settlement first? What if a 1 hp guard is standing on the palace tile River wants to use? What if Amber still rolls a bane? What if Ghor doesn't have any good forest spots? The fact that Sylas' power might as well not exist some times is the same issue other powers have while also being less powerful, free and/or consistent than his.
Even at full traitor Sylas I've never been afraid to fight him on Thane, River, Barnaby, or hell even Fight Amber, the +3 (or is it a total of +4?) prestiege and +3 gold is almost always worth the risk.
And if he's EVER killable with spells with a bounty like that, I take him out, the only scenarios I wouldn't kill a high bounties Sylas over another fight character is that the other guys about to win, I'm feeling super spiteful and don't even care about winning at that point, or I'm riding on Sylas' coat tails via an onscene amount of pacts and so he's more useful to me alive.