Poison antidote

[aperager]

Hello! Just a quick suggestion: When the king's declaration is to poison everyone, except the ones who pay 4 gold for the antidote, I think the already poisoned characters should be cured if payed 4 gold for a freakin antidote... Paying and still being poisoned just doesn't make any sense.

Thank you!

[Chepi]

In addition I'd like to suggest that the Poison Taster should prevent you from paying 4 gold. It would make him a little more useful, he's probably the worst follower in the game right now.

[Jokery]

u can always skip a turn if u dont wanna get dmg from poison

[Chaoseer]

Originally posted by Jokery:

u can always skip a turn if u dont wanna get dmg from poison

OP means something like this.

> Poisoned by a card (Poison Apple or Plague).
> Prestige leader choose declaration "The King will poison everyone, pay 4 gold for antidote". I repeat, for "antidote".
> Pay 4 Gold.
> Still poison.

You pay for the "antidote" right? So your current poison should be cure as well.

[Schrödinger's Wolf(Send Help!)]

I mean, it could be a different kind of poison...

Still, gameplay wise, I don't think it comes up enough to make that much of a difference.

May your journey in Armello be safe and fortuitous.
~Scribe

[Wyld kin]

Even if cases are really rare, the fact that a scenario can come up and not make sence or be an unenjoyable/unintuitive game desing is enough reason why it should be tweaked,
but yea, an nice explanation could be that it's just a different poison, even if you gotta admit that having to pay and still be poisoned reguardless must be kinda frustrating.

[Chapel]

Originally posted by Chepi:

In addition I'd like to suggest that the Poison Taster should prevent you from paying 4 gold. It would make him a little more useful, he's probably the worst follower in the game right now.

I agree with this

[AngelofAnger]

Also the actual scenario that cures already poisoned ones would be nice. So people can actually be more strategic on this declaration