Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The interesting question is: why can't that molecule exist? The rules of Sokobond make a lot of simplifications that aren't true in the real world, so what is the crucial difference?
(Don't try to find them all, there's nothing too exciting.)
In the same way you can't have O3 with a triangle loop (only simple bonds which would break themselves).
However some "hardly possible structures" can exist but decay very quickly.
Personally I found a level where you can have two different results.
When you start accumulating multi-bonds, the molecule sort of flattens out and the bond angles broaden to keep it stable. Packing a four multi-bonded atoms into a planar square would...well, it would want to explode really badly.
Image for those who don't want to open Youtube: http://i.imgur.com/PTCHNNE.png
The main reason you wouldn't see the OP's molecule in real life is that twisting bonds -- especially multi-bonds -- into unusual angles is like bending a really, really explosive spring. Square loop setups like cubane are possible, but very difficult to synthesize without losing your eyebrows/limbs. Cubane is actually unusual in that its final state is relatively not explodey.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1454055025
Not sure why this cannot exist.
Molecules are in 3D and as others said certain spacial angles will form as you create bonds.
Try to build this molecule: C=C is a good start and you'll have the next attachments at 120 angle like in ethilene. You put N on each with single bond, they can't reach each other to form a circle already. If you somehow force those bonds double: -N=C=C=N- it will form a straight line you can not bend (I think).
When an atom, like both carbons in this molecule, only has two orbital sets it needs to worry about (in this case the orbitals bonded to the other carbon and the nitrogen, because carbon has no left over electrons after the bonding), it is said to adopt "sp" hybridization. This means that two hybrid atomic orbitals form 180 degrees apart from each other in a straight line, and two more unhybridized orbitals called p_x and p_y exist each at 90 degrees to the bond axis in 3d space. One each of the p_x or p_y orbitals is used to form the second bond of the two double bonds on the central carbon.
This means that given the hybridizations of the carbons, the molecule should exist in a linear form .N=C=C=N.
For the nitrogens to bond to each other would induce incredibly strong stress in the bond, and is functionally impossible. To the best of my knowledge, no molecule with close to that amount of strain has been isolated. If you ever attempted to make this molecule it would basically instantly decay to cyanogen
I hope this made sense, this content is basically the condensation of the important bits from 1-2 lectures worth of chemistry.