Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
All Intel CPU since 2013 = Intel i4000 Series
All AMD FX till Ryzen2000 = really bad cause of amd hardware hack doing AVX2
All AMD since Ryzen 3000 = will run really smooth as any Intel CPU
so basically
All Intel >= i4000 series
All AMD >= Ryzen 3000 series
Crashes and freezes on AMD systems < Ryzen 3000 are most likely due to their very bad AVX2 support.
Well mate hey its me again.. :)
Technically correct and incorrect at the same time:
It literally quotes Ryzen1400 as minimum.
Ryzen1000 however does actually not have native AVX2 hardware support, It can run on a Ryzen1000 series by a microcode hack from amd in where they combine two AVX1 units to do avx2 calcs. But the performance is horrible as its more like a software hack then real hardware support.
Real avx2 units have only been implemented with Ryzen 3000 series.
But as 2K decided to quote 1000 compatibile they now also need to handle the crashes on AMD1000-2000 series which people are reporting here and in 2K support
btw little argument to your 2K rep you may talk to:
Bulldozer FX had actually the same (bad) AVX2 implementation as Ryzen 1000. Why did they mark bulldozer as incompatible but did say ryzen 1000 works? They have the very same avx units hardware wise.
If AVX2 is required, It should have quoted Ryzen 3000 a min specs, point out.
https://www.amd.com/en/support/downloads/drivers.html/processors/ryzen/ryzen-1000-series/amd-ryzen-5-1400.html
If there are multiple AVX2 solutions out there and that inconsistency is causing crashes, it's on AMD (and/or VC) to fix that. Send tickets to both 2K and AMD Support.
I don't know much about processors but apparently "Only Bulldozer GEN4 (Excavator) supports AVX2 instruction sets" which seems to be Athlon X4 processors. I don't remember anyone saying those don't run the game yet.
and then that ryzen 1000 sucks at certain avx2 operation came back to my mind
edit
here you go just scroll down for the benchmark pic, ryzen 1000 is sometimes up to 60%(!) slower in certain avx2 operations then intel i7-7000 series and even slightly slower as i7-6000
https://www.heise.de/news/AMD-Ryzen-Performance-unter-der-Lupe-3703483.html
My PC: Intel i7-8400, 8GB ram and Gtx 950.
Why do you say it was necesary to run the previous game?
Isnt it a bad optimization with 2k25 instead of a driver ? I am talking in ignorance since most of the people talking here meet the specs. (Clearly not me lol)
https://steamcommunity.com/app/2878960/discussions/0/612031852355540203/?tscn=1741877646#c596268777261247945
AVX2 is a hardware instruction set. It can't be installed via drivers. If the processor can't run it, they don't meet the specs.
Thanks for the info pal, will have that info.
Running processors or GPUs from 8+ years ago and expecting modern title to run isnt realistic. Even if the last game worked great.
Havent even tried to buy it, since I Saw that the game requires to have 16gb of ram.
I am not very fond of ultra graphics, so even at minimun, I enjoy games like resident evil 4