It NEEDS to be Free To Play

[uLevinho]

I mean, it's almost impossible to be in a 3v3 game being a seeker, you will always be playing a 2v3 or even a 1v3, it's really awful to wait for 3 minutes and ending up playing with only bots on your team ;/

[Apate]

Only if the people who paid for the game will get all the contet for free. Even the content that will come in the future.

[MartyrSaint]

Originally posted by uLevinho:

I mean, it's almost impossible to be in a 3v3 game being a seeker, you will always be playing a 2v3 or even a 1v3, it's really awful to wait for 3 minutes and ending up playing with only bots on your team ;/

I think if the game goes F2P then people are going to have to accept that MTX will be part of the game and they'll really have no right to complain about it.

It just wouldn't make sense to spend however much they did to make the game then give it away for free and then never make any profit whatsoever.

[SoyDon]

I dont think making it free to play is the solution, that will only bring microtransactions to keep the game live, i dont think the problem is a lack of players, if i q for keeper i find a match in less than 10 secs. The problem is that u can have only 1 seeker per game, and everybody wants to play as seeker. If u make it f2p, more people will q for seeker and you will have the same or a worst situation. What they need to do is find a way to encourage people to play other roles, maybe u can change the seeker role for antoher hitter, add 1 snitch spaw per game and make seeker a rol that will be rotating during game, so u still play seeker but u dont q for it

[uLevinho]

Originally posted by Apate:

Only if the people who paid for the game will get all the contet for free. Even the content that will come in the future.

Honestly, premium itens or a free pass it's good to me, it's really sad seeing that this game will flop in a couple of weeks, the gameplay is pretty funny :(

[uLevinho]

Originally posted by SoyDon:

I dont think making it free to play is the solution, that will only bring microtransactions to keep the game live, i dont think the problem is a lack of players, if i q for keeper i find a match in less than 10 secs. The problem is that u can have only 1 seeker per game, and everybody wants to play as seeker. If u make it f2p, more people will q for seeker and you will have the same or a worst situation. What they need to do is find a way to encourage people to play other roles, maybe u can change the seeker role for antoher hitter, add 1 snitch spaw per game and make seeker a rol that will be rotating during game, so u still play seeker but u dont q for it

fr bro, there's no rewards for playing in another positions, just some pfp. The seeker ideia it's interesting and it might be work. Also, i think de gk gameplay could be better, besides being difficult and even unfair in my opinion, you will spent 90% of the match playing as a chaser...

[Tay of the Lor]

Originally posted by Apate:

Only if the people who paid for the game will get all the contet for free. Even the content that will come in the future.

The senes of entitlement is pretty funny, if anything you will get a refund.

[SoyDon]

Originally posted by uLevinho:

Originally posted by SoyDon:

I dont think making it free to play is the solution, that will only bring microtransactions to keep the game live, i dont think the problem is a lack of players, if i q for keeper i find a match in less than 10 secs. The problem is that u can have only 1 seeker per game, and everybody wants to play as seeker. If u make it f2p, more people will q for seeker and you will have the same or a worst situation. What they need to do is find a way to encourage people to play other roles, maybe u can change the seeker role for antoher hitter, add 1 snitch spaw per game and make seeker a rol that will be rotating during game, so u still play seeker but u dont q for it

fr bro, there's no rewards for playing in another positions, just some pfp. The seeker ideia it's interesting and it might be work. Also, i think de gk gameplay could be better, besides being difficult and even unfair in my opinion, you will spent 90% of the match playing as a chaser...

hmmm i disagree, i have been playing hitter and kepper (becouse is instant q almost), and as hitter your impact is heavy. Keeper its my fav (seeker is my fav, but, lets say is keeper) but... i have to agree, kepper is by far the harder rol and u dont have too match to do when the ball is not coming and its a little lag dependant, if found myself seeing the catch animation and the chaser scoring aniways, but afther a little bit of practice i can stop 4 shoots per game more or less and it feels good, its a mind game at the end, but i agree it feels like it could be better, and i hope it will get better for the 6v6

[Lazarus]

Originally posted by Tay of the Lor:

Originally posted by Apate:

Only if the people who paid for the game will get all the contet for free. Even the content that will come in the future.

The senes of entitlement is pretty funny, if anything you will get a refund.

Good, If thats the route they go then I'll take my refund if offered and quit. There's too much F2P slop on the market as is.

[SophiaBella]

When ranked comes online , U don't want it to become F2P. Look at rocket league, A very high percentage are boosters who are trolling the true beginners.

You don't want that in a competitive game. 30 euro's for the game makes sure there will be less trollers

[Stormbleach]

Originally posted by SoyDon:

I dont think making it free to play is the solution, that will only bring microtransactions to keep the game live, i dont think the problem is a lack of players, if i q for keeper i find a match in less than 10 secs. The problem is that u can have only 1 seeker per game, and everybody wants to play as seeker. If u make it f2p, more people will q for seeker and you will have the same or a worst situation. What they need to do is find a way to encourage people to play other roles, maybe u can change the seeker role for antoher hitter, add 1 snitch spaw per game and make seeker a rol that will be rotating during game, so u still play seeker but u dont q for it

Do something similar like League of Legends does and add queueing for secondary role. Then you will get swapped between those. Even with a huge player base they had a similar problem as all wanted to play carries.

[Hyiugo]

Originally posted by SoyDon:

I dont think making it free to play is the solution, that will only bring microtransactions to keep the game live, i dont think the problem is a lack of players, if i q for keeper i find a match in less than 10 secs. The problem is that u can have only 1 seeker per game, and everybody wants to play as seeker. If u make it f2p, more people will q for seeker and you will have the same or a worst situation. What they need to do is find a way to encourage people to play other roles, maybe u can change the seeker role for antoher hitter, add 1 snitch spaw per game and make seeker a rol that will be rotating during game, so u still play seeker but u dont q for it

Take concord as an example, this game will do the same thing only this time it's the Harry Potter franchise, give it at least a year and the game won't last long, it doesn't take much to make the game free to play, making what's in the store only available through shop currency, or just grinding with currency in-game to obtain some items. while those who bought the game will have bonuses or some sort of free things.

[Hyiugo]

Originally posted by SophiaBella:

When ranked comes online , U don't want it to become F2P. Look at rocket league, A very high percentage are boosters who are trolling the true beginners.

You don't want that in a competitive game. 30 euro's for the game makes sure there will be less trollers

IF and i say IF the game has ranked it is going to be more dead. The game already matches you with bots, by doing you are just dividing the little community that the game has. Remember that there are also people who play the game for fun and not competitively. Putting ranked in a game that is played by few people makes no sense, a lot of free to play games make a lot of money by remaining free to play.

[aaron]

Let's see how they make 6V6 and what type of audience that brings.

I do think they need more players, but I'm curious how they could make it F2P without upsetting those who paid $30 for it and keeping to their word of no microtransactions.

[Jumps7yl3r]

No thanks, I don't want another "free to play" with mass micro transactions. I want to enjoy a fully paid game with all cosmetics and boosts on the same level playing field as the rest. Ty, bai.

[DRMilitao]

Originally posted by aaron:

Let's see how they make 6V6 and what type of audience that brings.

I do think they need more players, but I'm curious how they could make it F2P without upsetting those who paid $30 for it and keeping to their word of no microtransactions.

I'm ok with all heroes for free for the 30€ buyers.