Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why wouldn't it be? That's a genuine question btw.
flatscreen games have been in development for 50+ years, it's pretty much a perfected medium. I'm far more interested in how the VR support will turn out, It's a platform that is still be experimented and improved on
4 hours, even if it's 6 that is not enough to justify $40 imo.
Well the reviewers probably got permission to do a short review. A random YT channel doing a full play through likely just bought a physical copy that they got early.
Twitch has a policy in TOS that you can't stream a game before release without special permission, but I don't believe YT does. And even on Twitch I've seen people do it who got physical copies early, they only get in trouble if the devs make a complaint about it.
Anyway the point is no laws are broken. A contract could have been broken(embargo) if it was a review copy but it's likely it was just a physical copy they got early.
Guess we'll just have to wait for a good sale. Maybe $24.99 might have felt more honest to consumers who learn it's a 4 hour experience.
Meanwhile such people fork out 80-100 for generic slop every year, people seem to be under the impression that making games is cheap