安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Metacritic seems to have renormalized 'average' to basically 8.
Metacritic: Nothing higher than 60. 1.7 user.
Games Radar: 2.5
*Unbelievably unintuitive
*Often deathly boring
*Unfriendly difficulty
(2008 as well)
CCC: 2.8 avg (Best being graphics 3.8 worst music sound fx 2.2)
Mind, this is in 2008 where the graphics of the era are supposed to look like that. If you were to ask IGN and the others to re-review the game it most likely wont be anywhere near this high. Yay! Cherry picking!
*Picks up shovel and necromancy books and walks away, whistling*
Just read the review and they don't really like it, they basically give it a C
Well, then I guess you found the game for you! :)
No, that had nothing to do with it. It was deleted because you were trollling. Keep it up and you will be banned. Last warning.
Also, I love how this is a thread made last year. Or rather, the last post was a year ago; the post was made in 2014.
They think it's the same thing. It's censorship but reviews speak louder than deleted comments :)
Your opinion, not mine. The whole post was nothing but an attack. I'm not going to play semantics with you. Anyways, I think this thread has run it's course.