Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I personally have a problem with devs keeping most or all of the crucial info and communication to Discord. Topics get buried very quickly in a channel, and it's not common that threads (like here) are implemented on Discord. I use Discord, but not for every single game I'm interested in... that would be several hundred games. Plus Discord messages don't really show up in Google searches.
We've confirmed there will be offline with bots, which is fantastic, but what about coop without PVP? Haven't joined their Discord so I haven't heard if that's something that's happening. Would even love a way to do full online coop with groups of stranger players to run into, but without the ability to attack each other directly.
If the devs play their cards right - the similar emergent gameplay could elevate this game over the competitors.
Did they? Can you please give a link?
Thanks.