Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate HD

Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate HD

Futurism Dec 22, 2017 @ 12:53pm
Which one is better, Mirror of fate or Lords of Shadow?
I haven't played Castlevania since Symphony of the Night.

Last edited by Futurism; Dec 22, 2017 @ 12:55pm
Originally posted by SentinelGest:
Honestly? Lords of Shadow is much better than Mirror of Fate. The story is much more pronounced, Gabriel is likable and the way the story unfold is by far more complex than Mirror of Fate and the visuals help setting the experience.

Mirror of Fate was designed to fill the gap between Lords of Shadow and Lords of Shadow 2. Because it focuses on more than one character, and the story is really sparse, Mirror of Fate ends up looking more like a supplement than an actual game. Don't get me wrong, I still really like it and people should play Mirror of Fate, but I don't feel the same for these characters than I do for Gabriel Belmont (from Lords of Shadow).

I disagree that LoS is not Castlevania, it is a lot like the original NES games. I even often quote it as a great example of reboot. In short, it depends on what you like. LoS is very story centric, something no Castlevania before nor since has done. If you are a lover of story centric games, like I am, you will love LoS. If you prefer the occasional story with more freedom of exploration, MoF is more for you. However, being a great fan of SotN myself, I have to tell you that many fans were disappointed in MoF. It is not as good storywise as LoS and not as free exploration as SotN.

My advice, while I would recommend you to buy and play both LoS and MoF (and LoS2), go on YouTube or Twitch and look for walkthroughs. If you like what you see, buy the games and play for yourself. This is how I get into games, or not at all.
< >
Showing 1-4 of 4 comments
green_abobo Dec 23, 2017 @ 7:40am 
intresting.

why not?

get this. its 80% off & alot more castlevaniay then LoS imo.
The author of this topic has marked a post as the answer to their question.
SentinelGest Dec 24, 2017 @ 8:54pm 
Honestly? Lords of Shadow is much better than Mirror of Fate. The story is much more pronounced, Gabriel is likable and the way the story unfold is by far more complex than Mirror of Fate and the visuals help setting the experience.

Mirror of Fate was designed to fill the gap between Lords of Shadow and Lords of Shadow 2. Because it focuses on more than one character, and the story is really sparse, Mirror of Fate ends up looking more like a supplement than an actual game. Don't get me wrong, I still really like it and people should play Mirror of Fate, but I don't feel the same for these characters than I do for Gabriel Belmont (from Lords of Shadow).

I disagree that LoS is not Castlevania, it is a lot like the original NES games. I even often quote it as a great example of reboot. In short, it depends on what you like. LoS is very story centric, something no Castlevania before nor since has done. If you are a lover of story centric games, like I am, you will love LoS. If you prefer the occasional story with more freedom of exploration, MoF is more for you. However, being a great fan of SotN myself, I have to tell you that many fans were disappointed in MoF. It is not as good storywise as LoS and not as free exploration as SotN.

My advice, while I would recommend you to buy and play both LoS and MoF (and LoS2), go on YouTube or Twitch and look for walkthroughs. If you like what you see, buy the games and play for yourself. This is how I get into games, or not at all.
knightmere1 Dec 31, 2017 @ 10:29am 
Originally posted by Futurism:
I haven't played Castlevania since Symphony of the Night.
This game is better than Los 1 or 2 which were complete crap. This game feels like God of War in 2D with some metroid backtracking for items and collectibles.
tonberry Sep 15, 2018 @ 3:00pm 
I don´t like LOS but Mirror of Fate is worse.
< >
Showing 1-4 of 4 comments
Per page: 1530 50