Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://stellaris.paradoxwikis.com/The_Shroud#End_of_the_Cycle
Surely, the End of the Cycle also fits.
The event start with you finding a ruined world with no life and lots of tectonic activity.
The saying "the 4,444,444th turn of the tides will be the Last. Nothing will withstand Its rebirth." makes me think it's a Y2K or similar reference?
The next line confuses me though, I've never really thought about it much or maybe my dyslexia didn't catch it but I think there's a typo.
"Whatever that means, it seems that few of those who survived this deadly pilgrimage chose to return to the surface after reading it, instead giving themselves to the rivers of fire."
Shouldn't it say they "chose not to return?"
It's never stated they permanently remain shrouded (even if mechanically they do due to the relatively short timespan a campaign happens in, though by the same token it's never stated they DON'T permanently remain) after best End consumes the populace.
"Shadow that Devours All"
EoC systematically devours the entire galaxy, leaving behind shrouded or "shadowed" planets. It leaves the covenanted empire survivors for last, and depending on how strong the rest of the galaxy is it can take a while so it's totally possible that it took long enough the origin story faded from said empires common knowledge and it fell into legend/myth.
Tides are cyclical, and the "last" "turning of the tides" would be the end to a cyclical concept. That being said, I don't think the writers would have been trying to be that clever with their verbiage.
You could be right it isn't in reference to EoC (though I think it being a Y2K reference is a stretch), however it's the one I see as most plausible.