Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Try to integrate your vassal into your empire? I've never been in that situation and to be honest I just kick their ass if they ask for it.
This is something which need to be fixed in the AI.
Bad AI programming is fun sometimes. In my current game the marauders in two raids taken the shortest path which measn they enter a system with Stellarite Devourer and getting wiped out.
It needs no fixing because it's an extremely good move on part of your vassal, one that you might want to take yourself should you ever be in the same circumstances:
you've just been vassalized by a superior empire but you're sitting on an uncolonized holy world; you land your colonists; the FE gets offended and wages war against your overlord; they get destroyed; you can gain your independence much easier.
The same is true for the AI.
Yes exactly.
Even if it were intentionally designed like that, it would still require fixing because the way things work out is completely nonsensical and leaves the player with no recourse.
It's not intentional though, it seems that the logic that made the AI ignore holy worlds is simply broken.