Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you think it should be changed, head over to the Paradox Forums and leave a suggestion.
Personally, if I'm doing the vassalisation thing, I'm beeling diplomatic and Total War capacities so I can either convince them submission is better than extinction, and then annihilating them if they do resist so that I can take their entire empire for free and cut it up into bite-size chunks of loyal serfs thereafter.
What you're doing is just a three times more complicated, and 5 times more expensive way of achieving the same goal. Might need to still claim and then transfer the enemy's capital if it's within the territory, but that's about it.
But at the end of the day, I didn't come here to argue about that - if you want to play like that, that's entirely your decision. My point was that it's not possible because the devs have not made it possible, so if you want them to change that, your best bet is still to head over to the official Forums and turn it into a proper suggestion.
It seems strange but I believe you I don't see why you would invent this I will try thank you.