Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Giving it 1k alloys per month and also free diplomacy the miracle happened.
These bastards declare total war on everything. My ultra peaceful total war.
I had a blast playing as I scooped up the galaxy to fill my ring worlds.
No they are not, I think gestalt got a weaker worse option again and it really shows, my friend has started to call them Slowbots because just starting Lithoid and going Synth is so much better.
So, they are fine as long as you aren't playing them. Got it.
What exactly makes them bad in your opinion?
Driven assimilators were already unity starved early game. The new leader mechanics make them unplayable.
Oh boy, here we go with a lot of theorycrafting that isn't reflected in actual play. I'm telling you from experience, this goes beyond simply having lower unity in early game to being broken. Go find another thread to troll, Ryika.
That is literally the concept of a trade-off.
All the benefits of genocidals, none of the downsides, full total war CB, wars are actually useful as you can gain the only resource that truly matters (pops), you can engage in diplomacy, get federation bonuses, and vote on the galcom to avoid getting declared as the crisis forever.
If these guys are unplayable then nothing is.
"We can safely dismiss these people's opinions on liking the game, because they clearly like the game."
so what