Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The voidworms took out several systems and I built a big fleet and I was running in the red in energy. As I fought the voidworms, my energy was at like -1k/month and I assumed it was because they took out some crucial part of my economic infrastructure added on top of the expensive fleets I was fielding. Ended up defeating the voidworms right as I ran out of energy and so I disbanded my fleet expecting the energy expenses to go down. They did, a little but not much.
Turns out it was all those defense platforms. It put them even on outposts. I had about 91 systems and I just... had no interest in going back through and scuttling all those platforms, there were like 15 on each. I was losing 2k a month at the end.
That policy is... dangerous.
Edit: on the bright side, my game was running smooth as butter even at late game on such a large galaxy. I'll try running on max galaxy size next game. But I probably will opt against using that policy...
I thought there was an in-between step?