Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So unless you go 'swarmers only' is gonna raise cost of maintenance for other ships.
Sadly, I feel them underwhelming even in big swarms as later on they die to single hit of anything harder - and disbanding them or throwing them at random systems is just a hassle (and wasted CPU).
That could help them at least survive slightly better against small/medium sized weapons (still likely won't help much if at all against larger weapons though)
at some point you want to switch into it.
You will be swimming in nanites.
My home system as an Arc Welder was producing over 700 nanites, but yeah its crazy :P
And that does Matter how Exactly? You go 300+ Fleet Cap in aroung 50-80 years, depending on your Nation, Tech Luck and so on..... After around 100 years you Produce so much Ressources with Machines, that you an go over that 300 Cap 3 to 4 Times easylie.
So Yeah you send in a Main Fleet, which is basicly Build for Tanking, and behind that 4-6 Fleets of Swarmers......
How that is "Underwhelming" i will never Understand.
They Only Comparison this might not stand in Terms of Pure "Numbers" of Ships, might be the Menace Crisis, which basicly is its whole Point. To Crank out even more Fleets. Since new Arcfurnace and all that Stuff, will Help them as much as anyone else.