Nanite Worlds vs Machine Worlds

[TwoTonTuna]

Nanite worlds are pretty meh compared to Machine Worlds. Even when I factor in nanite production, N worlds just don't scale like nanite mining stations do every 5 years.

To highlight this point, my 18 stations all with nanite harvesters on them are churning out 1.2k nanites at year 2354 while my 13 nanite worlds are only eking out a mere 114 nanites a month from their blockers. This discrepancy will only grow every 5 years as the nanotech finisher further increases the nanite production of nanite deposits.

So I'd like to ask: what benefits do N worlds have over M worlds?

[shifty]

Denial - nanite worlds are not habitable for non-nanite species.

[NorthernDavid]

Originally posted by PhamTrinli:

Originally posted by shifty:

Denial - nanite worlds are not habitable for non-nanite species.

I'm pretty sure they are habitable if you are a machine race on the nanite ascension path and you used subsume world on one of your own worlds

A machine who took the nanite path /is/ a nanite species....

[PhamTrinli]

Originally posted by NorthernDavid:

Originally posted by PhamTrinli:

I'm pretty sure they are habitable if you are a machine race on the nanite ascension path and you used subsume world on one of your own worlds

A machine who took the nanite path /is/ a nanite species....

Sorry didn't see the "non-nanite" part