安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
The traits he's talking about literally cannot be removed and locks you out of further editing the species. In my case it was the brainslugs. The species window locks you out of modifying the species even with bio-engineering perks/research fully maxed.
A.) You cannot apply a template with brainslugs on the pops without them.
B.) You cannot apply a template without brainslugs to overwrite the species and remove it.
C.) The pops under a species template without brainslugs cannot be modified AT ALL, because brainslugs are required, yet they don't have brainslugs to begin with and you cannot select brainslugs to be added.
The entire point of bioengineering builds is so that you can min-max pops on a per planet basis. If you cannot modify your species anymore, then you've wasted the ascension perks/research.
The species window is honestly so buggy that I avoid any research/perks related to it now. It's a travesty that devs are handwaving it as "as designed" when it's so easy to break the game with it (events like alien box, special projects, colony ship without the trait, etc).
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/stellaris-3-2-2-abcc-can-not-apply-template-to-species-with-unmodifiable-traits.1500326/
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/stellaris-cant-modify-species-with-some-special-traits-brain-slug-cybernetic-necrophage-aquatic.1499277/
https://forumcontent.paradoxplaza.com/public/765076/2021_11_24_8.png
Check out this image in particular. His selected dolphin template has cybernetic + brainslug and intends to apply it to the rest of his species, but he CANT.
https://forumcontent.paradoxplaza.com/public/764622/Necro-Dolph.png
Still an issue in 3.3 beta it seems: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/stellaris-species-self-modified-resulting-in-sound-bug-and-in-ability-to-apply-template-to-sub-species.1508022/
Edit: Ah yes, it was an "update". Paradox strikes again. Don't let the game auto update, manually do it after you read about the bugs. Let others be the lab rats first.
until you close it.
Playing without mods, all DLC but plants.
These free traits lock up genetic engineering. There's no way getting rid of them, only
BUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUBBUB
If you get an event that adds a specialty trait you either get the continual blubing trying to select. Or simply the ability to modify goes grey even when you should be able. I'm getting that right?
I'll be sure to send that up to the paradox forum
I think it's event-gained Traits and special habitability traits (Gaia, Habitats , etc) that cause it
If you do a ring world start, and then could just quickly offset the habitabillity trait, that would just cheese the entire thing.
Maybe you could do it with evolution mastery and genetic sequencing, but that is quite far into the game, so at that stage it wouldn't really be so much of a exploit (whatever).
Just try get some migration treaties going if you want more pop diversity. Robots help too.
I do believe you're answering a question I didn't ask.
All other traits can be removed or granted, if you select all the relevant Ascension perks (Engineered Evolution and Evolutionary Mastery). But Ascension perk traits like Cybernetic or Psionic, and event traits (https://stellaris.paradoxwikis.com/Traits#Special_traits) cannot be removed once granted, or deliberately shared, regardless of which Ascension perks you may already have. Maybe there are exceptions, but this is the rule I have observed.
That is as the developers intend and is not a bug. This means that which ever group gets these traits becomes a separate group you need to micromanage a bit depending on how your OCD reacts ;)
The repetitive audio glitch that occurs when you have a sub group of a particular species that cannot be affected by the current template is a known bug that's been reported and acknowledged apparently.
Dumb? No.
As a fan of the Evolution ascension perks (i take them every game now), when I first found that I couldn't anymore share certain traits, I was initially annoyed too.
However, it does make sense to me now. The Cybernetic and Psionic traits not being shareable should be obvious. If they were shareable it would undermine the point of selecting the Ascension perks they relate to. It would be away to benefit from all three mutually exclusive Ascension perks for the price of one. That's hardly goodly design and obvious design to avoid.
The other traits also make sense to me in being exclusive to a lesser degree. If they could be shared it would undermine the desire to find the sites and events that spawn them first, before other civs do. Not being able to share the traits granted by certain events, projects/anomalies means you have a reason to explore more, find them and complete their various projects because unless you do someone else will.
This adds to the replay-ability of the game itself, as obtaining those desired traits is a race against other civs, and a priority that needs to be juggled against multiple other game priorities depending on which phase of the game you are in.
A background justification for these traits being un-shareable could be that the technology that grants them is to exotic or advanced to be understood well enough and to the same degree as other traits.
Here's a thought... I wonder if you would be receptive to the idea of allowing these special traits to be shared, but with unpredictable side effects (negative traits). Maybe even have a specific set of negative traits reserved just for this. Would be less "dumb" for you?
I'm not a fan of hard stops in a game, such as the "you cannot use this skill at this time", and prefer there to be options with consequences. So this might be one approach for you. But I'm not sure that would make you happy anyway.